PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Is it not an offense to not report criminal activity?

The database concerned was an external supplied one which City paid to access I would imagine that City had no control over password protocol which was probably quite weak at the time. They may have even shared a common password to save logging in an out at the time, certainly not unusual in lots of organizations in the past
It wouldn’t have surprised me if the system was sold on a “per user” basis and clubs just decided to save money by buying one licence to share between multiple users. I’ve seen plenty of businesses being cheapskates in this way.
 
Have Chelsea & PSG denied Liverpool, Arsenal & the Rags their rights to the champions league pot.

Every quid above the £80m revenue we used to earn in 2008 that we’ve earnt since they believe was theirs & it pisses them off.
This is the absolute crux of the matter.
The ‘history clubs’ feel denied and they won’t have it.
If we go back in history to the 63rd edition of the league (which was half the number of today) the most title wins were Arsenal (7) and then Sunderland (6) Rags, Dippers and Everton, all with 5
So the red shirts had 17 between them, about 27% of the titles available.

In the second half of the history of the league, from 1962/63, the Rags are on 15, Dippers on 14, Arsenal on 6 giving a total of 35 which is more than double the first half of football history.
Without City, they’d have won another 8 between them, which would have put them on 43. So, since 1962/63 they’d have won 69% of all top flight titles.

Even more starkly, since the introduction of the PL, without City, they’d have won 25 out of 32 or EIGHTY percent.
 
This is the absolute crux of the matter.
The ‘history clubs’ feel denied and they won’t have it.
If we go back in history to the 63rd edition of the league (which was half the number of today) the most title wins were Arsenal (7) and then Sunderland (6) Rags, Dippers and Everton, all with 5
So the red shirts had 17 between them, about 27% of the titles available.

In the second half of the history of the league, from 1962/63, the Rags are on 15, Dippers on 14, Arsenal on 6 giving a total of 35 which is more than double the first half of football history.
Without City, they’d have won another 8 between them, which would have put them on 43. So, since 1962/63 they’d have won 69% of all top flight titles.

Even more starkly, since the introduction of the PL, without City, they’d have won 25 out of 32 or EIGHTY percent.

Leicester wouldn’t have won it if we hadn’t shaken the whole league up. The rags would have continued hoovering up players & winning.
 
Leicester wouldn’t have won it if we hadn’t shaken the whole league up. The rags would have continued hoovering up players & winning.
Leicester might have won it, but none of the usual suspects would have cared. Same with us, if we’d won in 2012 and maybe had another with Pep, there’d be no charges. Leicester weren’t guilty of turning the whole house of cards upside down, which is where we’ve ’made our mistake’.

Mind you, the only single title winners in the PL era have both been relegated so maybe Blackburn and Leicester should have also ‘known their place’…..
 
Leicester wouldn’t have won it if we hadn’t shaken the whole league up. The rags would have continued hoovering up players & winning.
Leicester City and Blackburn Rovers prove that you can get a once in a generation blip for Champions. Neither of those clubs were exactly “squeaky clean”. Leicester managed to get a free stadium by going into administration and leaving lots of local businesses in the mire. Jack Walker clearly wouldn’t have been able to invest in Blackburn under the current financial rules. Neither club gets called out though. The reason is it’s a generational blip as I said and neither club were ever going to threaten the top 4 on any meaningful, regular basis. So they get their hair ruffled and looked upon with a dewy eyed romanticism. The double standards make me puke.
 
Very good film, there's a second one out this year, my mate drives actors to sets, he did that one. He's on the new series of Brassic starting today.

You're right about the analogy with the PL but Dave was so determined even though he had to raise £12m which originally was beyond him, shows what you can do.
So they filming the new Brassic ? I love that series, absolutely bloody love it .
 
This is the absolute crux of the matter.
The ‘history clubs’ feel denied and they won’t have it.
If we go back in history to the 63rd edition of the league (which was half the number of today) the most title wins were Arsenal (7) and then Sunderland (6) Rags, Dippers and Everton, all with 5
So the red shirts had 17 between them, about 27% of the titles available.

In the second half of the history of the league, from 1962/63, the Rags are on 15, Dippers on 14, Arsenal on 6 giving a total of 35 which is more than double the first half of football history.
Without City, they’d have won another 8 between them, which would have put them on 43. So, since 1962/63 they’d have won 69% of all top flight titles.

Even more starkly, since the introduction of the PL, without City, they’d have won 25 out of 32 or EIGHTY percent.
Spot on!

And to amplify your point, between the 1958-59 season when the great Wolves side under Stan Cullis won the title and the 1971-72 season when Cloughie's Derby County won it, there were 11 different victorious clubs in 14 seasons, including ourselves in 1967-68.

When I was growing up, at the start of every season every team harboured some hopes of either challenging for the championship or 'having a run in the FA Cup'

The advent of television controlled football in this (and every other European) country, plus the accretion of power around those core clubs/the Red Cartel that drove that television agenda, has resulted in where we are today, as in:

- 'The Devil take the hindmost' (such as the rest of the football pyramid) as far as the enormous amounts of money generated by the game are concerned and

- 'Don't even think about it.. that moolah is OURS, keep your hands off it or else..'

Absolutely disgraceful how our national sport has been treated by self-interested, self-entitled clubs..
 
It's against best practices to change your passwords. What was missing from city by the sound of it was the implementation of 2FA and SSO
well i'll be a monkeys uncle

i thought you were wrong on that so i went to check my facts and to my surprise you're dead right.

there are many links so just chose one for those that care modern-password-guidelines

whilst many years ago it was recommended to change regularly, that's no longer the case, as you rightly say. i wonder when it changed.

thank you for educating me that little bit.

i wrote some encryption code for our software years back to help with licensing and renewal etc. i might have to go check that isn't out of date too. although its point was more to make hacking attempts clear and deliberate rather than be foolproof
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.