PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Citizen of Legoland said:
That all depends on the frequency of use of the off-site software and theoretically it could have been detected when the legit user was blocked due to a fraudulent user being logged in, or as part of an audit of ip addresses, or as a result of changing from simple password to 2FA or a number of other matters. I work with software that still to this day allows the same login to be used from different locations at the same time, too. Sometimes the two logins are unaware of each other, sometimes they conflict and "steal" the screen of the other back and forth.

My point then and now is that if an ex employee had stolen a login from another user and had continued to use it after leaving the company I would have expected that user to be charged accordingly. As that didn't happen, I suspect both sides wanted to play the issue down.
Click to expand...
Your last paragraph is spot on, I totally agree
 
M18CTID said:
Yet when we got done for overpaying players some years before that - a practice that was recognised as being prevalent at pretty much every club - our manager was banned for life and the FA forced us to auction off our entire first-team squad in what was surely the heaviest punishment handed out in the history of English football.
Click to expand...
Leading Utd to claim their first title with a team /squad made up of our auctioned off players including the league’s superstar player Billy Meridith !
All because the leagues self proclaimed history clubs ( Arsenal /Villa etc) didn’t like the upstarts from the north that had bought their way to the top table with their ‘new’ money !

No where have I heard this before ?
 
slbsn said:
Costs were probably split in the APT hearing but we may never know. It would be a very good indicator who the Tribunal assessed as the overall winner.

Etihad has gone through for at least this season (look around) and it’s very large. We don’t know if City have successfully gone back on the rejected deal or simply accepted a lower amount as approvable. The ten year deal with the compounded uplifts in the later years will exceed £1bn.
Click to expand...

That's interesting. Do you think we may never know the judgment on costs? If so, do you think we may never know the outcome of the "second part" if the APT hearing at all?
 
Centurions said:
It's always been bent, from Wiki:-

The club controversially rejoined the First Division in 1919,[18][19] despite having only finished sixth in 1914–15, the last season of competitive football before the First World War — although an error in the calculation of goal average meant Arsenal had actually finished fifth, an error which was corrected by the Football League in 1975.[20][21] The First Division was being expanded from 20 teams to 22, and the two new entrants were to be elected at an AGM of the Football League. On past precedent the two places would be given to the two clubs that would otherwise have been relegated, namely Chelsea and Tottenham Hotspur. Instead one of the extra places was awarded to Chelsea and a ballot was called for the remaining place. The candidates included 20th-placed Tottenham and, from the Second Division, Barnsley (who had finished third); Wolverhampton Wanderers, (fourth); Birmingham (fifth, later amended to sixth); Arsenal; Hull City (seventh); and Nottingham Forest (eighteenth).[20] The League voted to promote sixth-placed Arsenal, for reasons of history over merit; Norris argued that Arsenal be promoted for their "long service to league football", having been the first League club from the South.[19] The League board agreed; Arsenal received 18 votes, Tottenham 8, Barnsley 5 and Wolves 4, with a further 6 votes shared between the other clubs.[18]

The announcement of the vote reportedly caught all the clubs, except Arsenal, unawares and the affair is a major contributing factor to the rivalry which has fuelled the long-standing enmity between Arsenal and Tottenham.[18][19] There is also an inconsistency in the argument – if "long service to league football" was the criterion for promoting Arsenal instead of Tottenham then Wolverhampton Wanderers, who finished two points ahead of Arsenal and were founder members of the Football League, would appear to have had a stronger claim. It has been alleged that this was due to backroom deals or even outright bribery by Sir Henry Norris,[18] colluding with his friend John McKenna, the chairman of Liverpool and the Football League, who recommended Arsenal's promotion at the AGM.[18] No conclusive proof of wrongdoing has come to light, though other aspects of Norris's financial dealings unrelated to the promotion controversy have fuelled speculation on the matter; Norris resigned as chairman and left the club in 1929, having been found guilty by the Football Association of financial irregularities; he was found to have misused his expenses account, and to have pocketed the proceeds of the sale of the Arsenal team bus.[22] Regardless of the circumstances of their promotion, Arsenal have remained in the top division since 1919, and as a result hold the English record for the longest unbroken stretch of top-flight football.[23] There appear to be no extant records of the meetings which elected Arsenal to the First Division in 1919, however the book Making the Arsenal proposes a different reason for their election in that year, arguing that match-fixing issues from the final year of football before the war (1914–15) were used by Norris as a weapon in his battle to get Arsenal promoted. He demanded that Liverpool and Manchester United (some of whose players had been found guilty of match fixing) be punished by relegation or expulsion, and threatened to organise a breakaway from the league by Midlands and southern clubs if nothing was done. To placate him the League offered Arsenal a place in the First Division.[24]

en.wikipedia.org

History of Arsenal F.C. (1886–1966) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...

Cunts to the power of 10.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.