PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

It blows me away that the comprehension level with other fans is so low as to think we've broken 115 separate rules. I dont even know if there are 115 rules for FFP/PSR
130 rules broken.

Keep up mate -:)

That’s one million points deduction and the club destroyed. Ironically ffp was supposed to stop clubs going to the wall lol.

Used Portsmouth as an excuse to rig the game in favour of the legacy clubs.

That’s corruption.
 
130 rules broken.

Keep up mate -:)

That’s one million points deduction and the club destroyed. Ironically ffp was supposed to stop clubs going to the wall lol.

Used Portsmouth as an excuse to rig the game in favour of the legacy clubs.

That’s corruption.

Always said the same. They knew what was coming between PSG and City and tried to lower the shutter. Unfortunately City slid under just in time.

It's never been about protecting smaller clubs from themselves or even parity. They just wanted a glass ceiling.
 
Just listened to Stefan on Talkshite. Bit about the 115 at the end. Jordan is dying for us to get found guilty. He says we have a case to answer but doesn’t expand on that. Calls us state owned again but doesn’t get picked up on that.
 
Just listened to Stefan on Talkshite. Bit about the 115 at the end. Jordan is dying for us to get found guilty. He says we have a case to answer but doesn’t expand on that. Calls us state owned again but doesn’t get picked up on that.

Well we have answered the case now we are awaiting the judgment, he’s using his listeners poor comprehension to Insinuate guilt whilst ensuring he doesn’t actually do that.
 
Re that maguire info from sky sports.

He said” another club is close to breaching premier rules, doesn't play in red”.

FFP in a nutshell. No need for any further discussion or debate.

Clubs have been making off the books payments for years and that’s only what we know about.

It’s a filthy game off the pitch.

be chelsea or forest
 
Just listened to Stefan on Talkshite. Bit about the 115 at the end. Jordan is dying for us to get found guilty. He says we have a case to answer but doesn’t expand on that. Calls us state owned again but doesn’t get picked up on that.
While listening to it, i was thinking. They were talking as if we're either going to be found guilty or not guilty.

Is it not more likely that we are found guilty of some of the charges but not all of them?

Therefore the punishment will be dependant on what these are.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.