jaiguruKun
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 5,728
No we didn't comply and agreed to pay a settlement. That would have been that as far as the PL was concerned if it wasn't for the leaked emails.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
No we didn't comply and agreed to pay a settlement. That would have been that as far as the PL was concerned if it wasn't for the leaked emails.
mcfcbill91
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2015
- Messages
- 92
There's a need to remain calm.
We all know there's a political whirlwind around these charges, be it other clubs, regulators the lot.
Have they just charged in volume, hoping one sticks and they look tough? A bit like UEFA with the two year ban, hoping CAS would only take a year off?
Every half-wit with an internet connection, including the usual journalists will be out grandstanding, spelling out our demise.
Patiently waiting a breakdown of the charges in full from ProjectRiver and experts.
We all know there's a political whirlwind around these charges, be it other clubs, regulators the lot.
Have they just charged in volume, hoping one sticks and they look tough? A bit like UEFA with the two year ban, hoping CAS would only take a year off?
Every half-wit with an internet connection, including the usual journalists will be out grandstanding, spelling out our demise.
Patiently waiting a breakdown of the charges in full from ProjectRiver and experts.
iwasthere1968
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2011
- Messages
- 1,015
If this goes on for years and through the courts it will be financially damaging for the PL. Plus if we do have stuff on other clubs going to get very messy for them. High stakes for both them and us. I bet they turn the microphones off on Sunday.
Sorry was asking about another post.
bluemoon32
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 24,736
- Team supported
- City
He's a GoonerProbably needs a bullet proof vest now, bet he's a rag or dipper.
journolud
Well-Known Member
any chance someone can update the thread title when City make a statement. Can't bear to read god knows how many pages of flapping.
meeesh
Well-Known Member
It'll take ages to sort with sounds of things,so may as well do a Chelsea in summer and spend 600m,fuck it
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Is it a private investigation?Looks like Mark Knopfler.
Is it a coincidence that the charges have been brought, then 3 hours later, the government put back the release of their regulatory white paper on football from this week to the end of February?
I’m sure it is only a coincidence, but odd timing for me
I’m sure it is only a coincidence, but odd timing for me
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,503
Yes. Apprarently abiding by UEFA FFP is one of the Premeir League's rules. We've been charged for not doing that in 2013-2018, and charged for not complying with the investigation from 2018-2023.
In respect of each of Seasons 2013/14 to 2017/18 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons requiring a member club to comply with UEFA’s regulations, including UEFA’s Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations, namely:(a) for Season 2013/14, Premier League Rule B.14.6; and(b) for Seasons 2014/15 to 2017/18 inclusive, Premier League Rule B.15.6.
Then that would be a complete stitch up. Trumped up charges where we had evidence of an investigation being leaked & went to CAS.
This is not about ffp. It is largely allegations of false accounting.
Some of the charges relate to non-compliance with UEFA's ffp investigation.