PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[stan bowles]

Here we go.

They’re all meeting.

Even the fu*king Saudis and Newcastle are apparently in on it.

As for Boehly, having just spent hundreds of millions on players and getting around FFP by giving all the new players long contracts.

Cunts, the lot of them!

PICTURED: Premier League bigwigs head to London for 'feisty' meeting

Todd Boehly and Amanda Staveley were pictured rocking up at London's Churchill hotel as representatives from top flight clubs gathered to discuss the charges against Manchester City.

www.dailymail.co.uk

If anyone should be finger pointing then it's Soriano. We are allowed to be there, aren't we ? This reads like it's a closed meeting with Soriano stood outside the room trying to listen in through oak-panelled doors. Ridiculous from the Fail.

 

[Lord Blue]

Legal people are like dodgy builders being paid on day work. If they sort it out quickly they're not going to get paid as much

I suppose it would be naïve to think they would win quickly to enhance their reputation, hence allowing them to take their next job at a higher rate, and earning more in total

 

[Centurions]

Will we have that shit hot woman that took the cas case on when pannick was double booked or something ? Forget her name , her on the team would be brilliant

She's 66 now Kaz, she's still a good looking woman given her age but I'm not sure about shit hot TBH.

 

[Robinho's Subbuteo]

So, do the team trot out at the weekend with "Why Always Us?" T-shirts on and a picture of Mario winking?

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

It Was presented. It wasn't taken into consideration because it wasn't needed to, the other evidence was sufficient. The PL, according to numerous lawyers writing on it including the young guy on youtube in his bedroom, have the same time barred element to 6 years. Unless, they have reason to believe they need to make an exception. Which they must have had, if charges go back to 2009.

It was offered but not presented mate. The hearing was over quicker than anticipated, we were convinced we had won after day one.

We wanted to show everything but Uefa said it was time barred. City defo took the lot.

I actually PM'd @projectriver (Stefan) to tell him Simon Pearce had been put up by us and he said there would be no way City would do that and was a disaster to think.

It actually proved to be pivotal. I'm worried he may have to testify again.

 

[MillionMilesAway]

Privately, quite possibly. But it'll be a bloody difficult thing to put on the agenda with Soriano in the room.

And when the charges have been laid and passed to Rosen.
No-one involved can say anything much of note.

 

[meeesh]

So, do the team trot out at the weekend with "Why Always Us?" T-shirts on and a picture of Mario winking?

Glad you said winking

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

If anyone should be finger pointing then it's Soriano. We are allowed to be there, aren't we ? This reads like it's a closed meeting with Soriano stood outside the room trying to listen in through oak-panelled doors. Ridiculous from the Fail.

Soriano tonight:

 

[Bez]

The latest Premier League handbook I found on line starts with:

Premier League Chairmen’s Charter
Season 2020/21
Foreword
The Chairmen’s Charter is a statement of our commitment and aim to run Premier League football to the highest possible standards in a professional manner and with the utmost integrity. With that aim we, the Chairmen of the Clubs in membership of the Premier League, are determined:
• To conduct our respective Club’s dealings with the utmost good faith and honesty.
• At all times to maintain a Rule book which is comprehensive, relevant and up-to-date.
• To adopt disciplinary procedures which are professional, fair and objective.
• To submit to penalties which are fair and realistic.
• To secure the monitoring of and compliance with the Rules at all times.

That's why I think the amout of money involved is interesting.
How much money can be translated to how much differece it made.
And how much difference it made must, for professional, fair and objective procedures must translate to what a fair and realistic punishment is.

That's reassuring. That said, the way the charges were announced left a bit to be desired. The media seemed to know before City. Plus, I believe they are under pressure from Man U, Loverpool and Arsenal so they may try to look tough if any punishment is handed out. We shall see.

 

[Gordyola]

OK, so have they refused to cooperate with the PL investigation for a similar reason?

IIRC the reason was they didn't want to give the detailed financial information which could fall into the hands of rivals which would be to their advantage
They went to court
https://hsfnotes.com/arbitration/20...er-s67-and-68-of-the-english-arbitration-act/
They then went back to argue that the judgment shouldn't be published the PL supported however the court decided it was in public interest
"MCFC relied on the fact that its appeal was supported by PL"

ENGLISH COURT OF APPEAL ORDERS THE PUBLICATION OF TWO JUDGMENTS IN AN ARBITRATION CLAIM BETWEEN MANCHESTER CITY FOOTBALL CLUB AND THE PREMIER LEAGUE

In Manchester City Football Club Ltd v Football Association Premier League Ltd and others [2021] EWCA Civ 1110, the English Court of Appeal considered whether to order the publication of a High Cou…

hsfnotes.com