decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 14,533
We need the cash in the bank to pay off the independent court.Why would a low net spend help ?
Just interested
We need the cash in the bank to pay off the independent court.Why would a low net spend help ?
Just interested
I suppose the old "no smoke without fire" argument. Or the "you got off on a technicality" guff. Our name will be shit to many football fans and journos for years going forward, even if we win.
Couldn’t give a rats arse what anyone else thinks. We’ll beat this, crack on as per and the silverware will continue to flow, as will the bitter tears of our rivals.I suppose the old "no smoke without fire" argument. Or the "you got off on a technicality" guff. Our name will be shit to many football fans and journos for years going forward, even if we win.
Stephen Warnock will be on sky sports news soon pretending to know the ins and outs of footballing finance just because he's put on a pair of glasses. The boring scouse c*nt.One of my own personal joys in life are people who don't even know how English football is structured via the premier league, league and FA, confidently explaining some of the most technical parts of global sports contract law.
Unless we claim victimisation? Or ethnic racism being targeted and blow the whole corrupt organisation to bits?
Surely Chelsea's accountants must be working overtime nowI am wondering if we did know something was coming? The incredibly low net spend over the last 5 years, and in particular the last year? Not saying the club agrees with the charges, just that we knew a load of charges were coming our way?
And is a member of Arsenal.Looks like Mark Knopfler.
Along as we don't play inverted fullbacks and Stones is back in the back four. We have a good chance.I look forward to our defence against the allegations as a final chance to bury them.
If it all goes tits up, I will still be a City fan. If we have years in the wilderness, I will still be a City fan. If we play an Academy team every week, I will still be a City fan.
Well if we don't then it's off to the High Court we goHere's the problem right there in that part of the statement.
"The Club welcomes the review of this matter by an independent Commission, to impartially consider the comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence that exists in support of its position."
We won't get an independent commission to impartially consider the evidence will we?
As long as we got back to our usualTiming is everything.
Guess which clubs are currently trying to attract a buyer...
Arsenal used to pay image rights off shore going all the way back to Henry.
They have thrown everything at the wall to ensure something will stick and a punishment forthcoming.
If I had to guess, they will include a massive fine, points deduction (for next season) and a longer transfer ban.
They want us out of business, and now making the Champions League will be a part of that.
That's the one thing we are guilty of. Effectively we admitted it and paid a reduced fine. Surely we can't be punished twice.