Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 12,996
Perhaps another point is that the 3 on the CAS panel still managed to make it 2 to 1 in our favor rather than 3 to 0 despite being all legally qualified and presumably been guided by the Chairman.
I don't think that's quite right. There were a series of issues that CAS had to decide, and whilst I don't think they were all 3-0, I don't think they were all 2-1 either. There were certainly areas where the CAS ruling points out that a majority of the panel thought X, Y or Z. However that was not said in relation to every issue. It seems to follow that in other areas the panel was unanimous.
It's some time since I've looked at the ruling in detail, I should add, that's just my recollection.