Just a question about the player's remuneration.The image rights issue is different for me because , and as I have pointed out before, players wages in England and how they are paid and by whom is under the FA/PLs remit . No part of a players remuneration can be paid by any other entity.
Starting to think your name is a piss take seeing as every post I see from you makes me depressed.One thing for certain is 95% is certainly not off the table. City might be happy to out on a fake smile and let that be leaked but 95% not being on the table is nonsense.
The entire system was accessed, so that wouldn’t add up.He/she wasn't hacked as far as I'm aware. The three employees who had already left, knew their log in details, either through familiarity with the remaining person or they were given them at one time for whatever reason. It did cross my mind that he/she was left in place on purpose as an undercover spy, but I suspect that the club would have pressed for a prosecution if they had any inkling of that.
Why are you assuming that?The judicial panel is appointed as per the attachments as per rules W.20, W.21 and W.26.
The appointed panel members have to sign an impartiality agreement and I believe as the Respondent to the charges we have 48 hours to raise any objections to the proposed panel members.
Assuming the appointed panel members abide by the impartiality conditions then this should not be an issue.
It would be great to get clarification of that.
I’m sick of hearing other fans say that the whole case was 2 1. And that it’s only because we picked 2 of the panel.
LOL a big career jump going from us to Celtic FFSQuite a lot of our admin back room staff are leaving, another one today off to Celtic. Is it linked in anyway I wonder?
Maybe that's because Simon Jordan on talksport is allowed to spew lies and hate and mention city with its "manufactured club with no history" claim and the ordinary fans takes it as gospel I know I know I'm guilty of listening to ts but he can't help himself he has to drag city into any argument ...I really hope he slips up one day with his words but he's there for a reason and is getting away with itMostly ! Everyr fan who has voiced their vitriol about us will have no idea what we're are illedged to have done wrong !!!
Depends which lens you choose to look through. I have no idea what level of integrity the panel will have nor does anyone else on this forum. We can only guess. However, it is a known fact that when someone looks someone in the eye, which the tribunal will have to do to Man City and our representatives, human beings are more likely to be honest. Plus, the tribunal members will have personal reputations to maintain.Why are you assuming that?
It’s not like anyone has never signed something and done something else before? Especially when there’s no way of pinning that on them
The impartiality agreement if breached by a tribunal member would no doubt have legal ramifications for that individual if proven. Do you want to be sued by Man City?