Eccles Blue
Well-Known Member
Have we been given a date yet? I try to avoid the sensationalism by the media. (& the up and downism on here) ;-)
So I’m in ignorance. :-)
So I’m in ignorance. :-)
I checked yesterday and there was no requirement to provide details of any other payments made to our manager from another party. the requirement is in the rules for 2022/23 season when we were charged.There was no requirement to provide details of the manager's contract with other clubs in those days, was there?
And even if there was, what was the consequence? Did it give a sporting advantage?
Not yet Eccles. More likely to be 2025 I think?Have we been given a date yet? I try to avoid the sensationalism by the media. (& the up and downism on here) ;-)
So I’m in ignorance. :-)
I’d be surprised if they could make such changes have retrospective effect? Can they?I checked yesterday and there was no requirement to provide details of any other payments made to our manager from another party. the requirement is in the rules for 2022/23 season when we were charged.
Wasn't there some chat a while ago that City had gone to court or complained about something? The media theory was that we were complaining that the guy in charge of the IC was an Arsenal fan but I seem to remember someone saying on here that it was because they were charging us under current guidelines and understanding of the rules rather than what the rules actually said in the season we are accused of breaching them
I know. Funny as fuck.I urge all Blues to ignore the silly online blog. Because of the way it's designed & presented, I thought it was a legitimate outlet, but on further investigation, it's a one man & his dog blog, run by rival fans who hate City.
But there are transactions as part of the leaks too though. There aren’t intra-group discussions, it’s potentially us negotiating with him on their behalf.
Oh that’s fine then. The FA or whoever will probably be gone by then and it won’t matter. *cheeky grin*Not yet Eccles. More likely to be 2025 I think?
I checked yesterday and there was no requirement to provide details of any other payments made to our manager from another party. the requirement is in the rules for 2022/23 season when we were charged.
Wasn't there some chat a while ago that City had gone to court or complained about something? The media theory was that we were complaining that the guy in charge of the IC was an Arsenal fan but I seem to remember someone saying on here that it was because they were charging us under current guidelines and understanding of the rules rather than what the rules actually said in the season we are accused of breaching them
Nigel Clough *could* replace Pep Guardiola?I know. Funny as fuck.