PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Bringing kids up now to support a team in our case CITY not only do you follow the club you have to teach them accountancy its a fucking joke thank you red tops and spuds for slowly ruining our game because you can’t stand the fact we’re the best run and successful club in prem
 
GaudinoMotors said:
What will today bring then? Another episode of FriendsReunited? The A to Z Guide to Legal Jargon? Will GDM let anything go? Will Tubster extricate his tongue from Steffan (swoon)? Can Tin Foil swear any more? Is anything not the Tories fault? Will I say anything positive? These questions—and many others—will be answered in the next episode of

PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules / The Mousetrap.​

Click to expand...

I read that in the voice of soap
 
The Stockport Iniesta said:
Ratcliffe must know the rags need a huge rebuild, also known as spending your way out of trouble. These rules have probably made that much more difficult depending on the multiplier.

It's almost surreal that the club now find themselves as allies with the rags on this, given what's gone before.
Click to expand...

Fuck that and fuck them.
 
Chappie said:
I can assure you , he was grumpy git,when we were shit
Click to expand...
I can assure you both that whilst I hold my hand up to being grumpy i certainly don’t want us to be shit.

My earlier comment was highlighting that we had dozens of giddy posts on here at the weekend thinking there was a gonna be a sea change of coverage because City had finally started to send legal letters to the media that has libelled us.

It’s taken all of 2 days for Hebert of the Mail to write about the new PL rules being set up to stop us cheating.

Raises doubts in my head that any cease and desist letters have been sent anywhere.
 
Dribble said:
So seeing as much of this info is already in the public domain, what are HMRC, the SFO & the police waiting for? Like the recent situation with Angela Rayner, why haven't we been reported by someone and/or had our collar felt yet because the authorities have become aware of City's potential criminality?

Are you seriously suggesting the UK Statutory Authorities are waiting for the Premier League's Independent Commission to do their job for them, before they strike & move in to raid the Etihad & slap the bracelets on our Executives?



Civil Law is concerned with the rights & property of individual people or organisations, & settles disputes between them, so this could extend to infinity over the most petty of disputes including who owns a pet, or if a neighbour's overhanging tree is encroaching on your property. Let's be honest about the very serious to ultra petty scope of UK Civil disputes here.

As far as I'm aware, only the CPS, police & certain statutory bodies can "charge" people in the UK, & this relates to criminal matters & covers several civil matters too.

When did the PL "charge" City? Have they ever used the "legal" term in respect to us? If not, why? All I've heard from the PL is "allegations" & "breaches".



They are "breaches" it's a "hearing" & there's nothing "legal" about it, unless/until a statutory body moves in to investigate with a view to issuing criminal or civil proceedings.

People can use whatever terms they like in reference to these breaches. My point is it's way beyond semantics as to why the PL have (in my opinion) carefully chosen not to. You believe there's nothing in this, but I believe this is absolutely crucial to properly understanding the alleged breaches & the resultant IC hearing.

I too got myself so deep in the forest that I couldn't see the wood for the trees. Yes, I fully support Manchester City, not just as a City fan, but because after getting out of the forest & taking a global overview, I saw these allegations very differently.

The very careful language used by the PL, the fact this has been played out so publicly but yet no statutory body has been complained to, or been on contact with City (to our knowledge) is critical to understanding my viewpoint.

To my knowledge the PL have never used the words "fraud" "charges" "case" "legal" or "guilty" against us & I suspect there's a VERY good reason why.

The PL aren't a statutory body, so are toothless in actual UK Law. They have no legal duty to find us "guilty" or "not guilty", & will just about be able to find us "liable" or "not liable", & even then only in the literal sense of the words, & not the legal sense.

Now I could be wrong here, so I'd appreciate it if you could provide counter empirical evidence to the contrary if you think I am. I don't mind my assertations being challenged & found to be in error, because at the very least it will help settle the minds of millions of worried City fans one way or the other.

Essentially, you feel City are on the verge of very serious legal jeopardy which will put our very PL existence in peril if we're found "guilty" of the "charges".

I feel these are jumped up allegations by a private members club who have about as much clout as the Wheel Tappers & Shunters Social Club's executive committee.

The PL's evidence is based on hacked & spliced emails from which they've formed suppositions & made subsequent allegations.

I think where we can both agree is that the level of cogency required to find us liable is seriously high, & for City's first batch of evidence, we've presented our audited, verified company accounts for starters.

Over to you, the Premier League & their Independent Commission.
Click to expand...
 
Sk@mcfc said:
Bringing kids up now to support a team in our case CITY not only do you follow the club you have to teach them accountancy its a fucking joke thank you red tops and spuds for slowly ruining our game because you can’t stand the fact we’re the best run and successful club in prem
Click to expand...
Just don't engage, turn it into a joke! Who cares what other people think? We're living the dream!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top