PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Definitely, where I grew up in Gorton it was easily 80% blue.
where i grew up was mainly rag but looking at back that was a good thing, the amount of crap i had to put up with growing up when we were shite and they were winning everything not only makes our current success all the sweeter but means people wittering on about 115 charges is water off a ducks back.
 
Can someone please remind me as it's been a while.

1. How many emails did that hacker get access to at City?
2. How many are being presented (albeit spliced together and taken out of context) as 'evidence' against us?
 
Definitely, where I grew up in Gorton it was easily 80% blue.

I started work in 1969.

In my year the were 2 blues, me and a lad called Ian Holden, we use to go to the match together, got on the bus at Irlam O’th Heights that went to town and got on the special from Aytown street. We ended up meeting a few more blues from Salford and use to go to the games together. We were out numbered by the scum then. There are more blues around now.
where i grew up was mainly rag but looking at back that was a good thing, the amount of crap i had to put up with growing up when we were shite and they were winning everything not only makes our current success all the sweeter but means people wittering on about 115 charges is water off a ducks back.
 
Quick question (sorry if it's been covered) - the PL have accused us of providing inaccurate accounts. Does this mean the accounts posted at Companies House or just the accounts provided to the PL after making adjustments to the statutory accounts, as required by the PL?
 
Quick question (sorry if it's been covered) - the PL have accused us of providing inaccurate accounts. Does this mean the accounts posted at Companies House or just the accounts provided to the PL after making adjustments to the statutory accounts, as required by the PL?
I would have thought companies house because the PL would be able to cross check the accounts provided against that and prove guilt? I know nothing though.

But why?
 
If the statutory accounts are in question then that could be very serious. If it's just the adjustment as per PL requirements then that will remain as only a dispute between us and the PL.
 
If the statutory accounts are in question then that could be very serious. If it's just the adjustment as per PL requirements then that will remain as only a dispute between us and the PL.
It would have to be the statutory accounts. There‘s unlikely to be an adjustment for “additional sponsorship income”. Which is why the PL are implicitly accusing City of fraud and false accounting. But the accounts have always been signed off by the auditors as true and fair and they didn’t resign shortly after these accusations first surfaced. Which they almost certainly would have done if City had been pulling the wool over their eyes
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.