nah, no idea whats happened there! nowt to do with me
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
nah, no idea whats happened there! nowt to do with me
Not even for the clause in his contract: Should the club be sanctioned in any way for breeches of regulations, the club will pay Gundogan £5m.Gundog would never have come back if he thought we were getting done.
Gaz (FMwkdsoul)
Well-Known Member
thought as much tbh, but always good to ask.nah, no idea whats happened there! nowt to do with me
What a surprise. Random guy in CB tells whoppers.nah, no idea whats happened there! nowt to do with me
abu13
Well-Known Member
Fucking hell, there are some real balloons over on the Caf.
There seems to be a distinct lack of perspective on the whole farce of these charges.
Fans of other clubs have in mind that everything we do is fraudulent and the narrative of the media is that we have cheated the system from day one and continue to do so now.
And so because of this "enormous" ongoing fraudulent expenditure we have the best players and best manager and so heir poor little clubs (with similar levels of income) can't compete, because somewhere along the line we have £billions more income than we have ever shown in our accounts.
As I understand the actual allegations are that our accounts conceal a relatively small amount of extra sponsorship money a good number of years ago.
Obviously if our accounts are fraudulent then that alone is a serious matter, but can anyone tell me what the maximum amount of money is that we are supposed to have concealed in our accounts and how long ago this was?
I am guessing that the amount is pretty insubstantial compared to revenues and a long time ago.
Fans of other clubs have in mind that everything we do is fraudulent and the narrative of the media is that we have cheated the system from day one and continue to do so now.
And so because of this "enormous" ongoing fraudulent expenditure we have the best players and best manager and so heir poor little clubs (with similar levels of income) can't compete, because somewhere along the line we have £billions more income than we have ever shown in our accounts.
As I understand the actual allegations are that our accounts conceal a relatively small amount of extra sponsorship money a good number of years ago.
Obviously if our accounts are fraudulent then that alone is a serious matter, but can anyone tell me what the maximum amount of money is that we are supposed to have concealed in our accounts and how long ago this was?
I am guessing that the amount is pretty insubstantial compared to revenues and a long time ago.
BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
I am surprised at you even going there pal, what do you expect to read about us, rational balanced debate?Fucking hell, there are some real balloons over on the Caf.
Last edited:
Nah, everyone knows they are getting double salary in brown envelopesIf the players dont trust the club they would have gone in the summer , i think they know the score , that the prem are out to get us , seems to motivate them to win more
Selotaped under the table at breakfast
Soon as the seasons over they’ll be a mass exodus and sign for Utd Tarquins and dippers
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
think it was one of them news generator sites after clicks it was right early in day they had finished butties when it appearedThey've got me confused with someone else lol. Wasn't me.
In fairness, the sponsorship allegations, if all proved, are quite material and serious albeit quite a while ago.There seems to be a distinct lack of perspective on the whole farce of these charges.
Fans of other clubs have in mind that everything we do is fraudulent and the narrative of the media is that we have cheated the system from day one and continue to do so now.
And so because of this "enormous" ongoing fraudulent expenditure we have the best players and best manager and so heir poor little clubs (with similar levels of income) can't compete, because somewhere along the line we have £billions more income than we have ever shown in our accounts.
As I understand the actual allegations are that our accounts conceal a relatively small amount of extra sponsorship money a good number of years ago.
Obviously if our accounts are fraudulent then that alone is a serious matter, but can anyone tell me what the maximum amount of money is that we are supposed to have concealed in our accounts and how long ago this was?
I am guessing that the amount is pretty insubstantial compared to revenues and a long time ago.