PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Inter Me Nan]

Scouse **** in talking shite shocker!!!

 

[Sir peace frog]

makes me laugh someone (anyone ) says something and its rant rant rant for pages on end ,even a poor news reader got page after page of abuse , fuck em must be me but i really dont give a fuck what anyone says about city except the judges.

 

[marco]

makes me laugh someone (anyone ) says something and its rant rant rant for pages on end ,even a poor news reader got page after page of abuse , fuck em must be me but i really dont give a fuck what anyone says about city except the judges.

and thats about it, its all that matters, its going to be fun though watching and listenig to them when were cleared, the hyperboil steaming piss rants are going to be a delight

 

[At-Swim-Two-Birds]

and thats about it, its all that matters, its going to be fun though watching and listenig to them when were cleared, the hyperboil steaming piss rants are going to be a delight

If we are cleared City need to press on and let the courts explain to these people that whilst speech is free they need to pay for the lies.

 

[Centurions]

makes me laugh someone (anyone ) says something and its rant rant rant for pages on end ,even a poor news reader got page after page of abuse , fuck em must be me but i really dont give a fuck what anyone says about city except the judges.

Certainly not just you. It's like rival fans (and rags) on social media starting off with "Nobody cares about City", before going on a long rant about exactly why they don't care.

 

[give it to gordon]

makes me laugh someone (anyone ) says something and its rant rant rant for pages on end ,even a poor news reader got page after page of abuse , fuck em must be me but i really dont give a fuck what anyone says about city except the judges.

When City speak I listen

When knobheads speak I don't.

 

[Bert Swift]

ETIHAD Value for Money and Unlawful Premier League Rules

The world’s best airlines have been ranked and rated.

This is what a recent, comprehensive survey revealed -

"The Gulf airlines – Dubai-based Emirates, Doha-headquartered Qatar Airways and Abu Dhabi’s Etihad – are leading the way, as is Singapore Airlines, long a favourite of UK travellers. Turkish Airlines ranks highly..."

"US airlines’ reputation for treating passengers as self-loading freight is confirmed, with no American carriers in the top 20 (Alaska and Delta are the closest at 23rd and 24th)."

Do we trust consultants at the Premier League, who have also undertaken work for redtops clubs, to have the final say about what they deem to be fair market value? Why is their opinion weightier than the actual and wider considerations of the parties to the sponsorship and partnership transactions? It is the latter that ultimately decide on reasonable `worth`

Checks and balances are important, however, surely ETIHAD has to be one of the best value, long term sponsorships ever for brand recognition across the world.

See link -

https://brandfinance.com/press-rele...the world's most valuable football club brand.

C`mon Brentford, Chelsea and CITY.

 

[hammocity]

makes me laugh someone (anyone ) says something and its rant rant rant for pages on end ,even a poor news reader got page after page of abuse , fuck em must be me but i really dont give a fuck what anyone says about city except the judges.

So right, I resumed the thread about 20 pages ago, read a few and it was non informative shite, fast forwarded to the last page and still the same shite, I'll come back next week.

 

[M23 Citizen]

I’ve felt for some time that Carragher sails far closer to the wind in terms of what he says about City’s finances than pretty much any other mainstream broadcaster. He’s essentially accusing the club of committing industrial scale fraud there, in terms of our turnover numbers. I don’t think there’s any other reasonable way of evaluating what he’s said there in the penultimate paragraph.

It also exposes an inability (or wilful blindness) to undertake a simple analysis of the numbers, because City’s turnover is essentially pretty simple maths that is significantly made up in recent years of the largest TV revenue of any team in world football and huge levels of prize money, figures for which are readily and publicly available, especially to someone like Carragher. It’s actually pretty straightforward to see where the rump of City’s revenue comes from, given how successful we’ve been over the last decade. Any person with a modicum of understanding about simple accountancy principles should be able to grasp how the numbers are broadly arrived at.

Thinking this through logically, Carragher would certainly not be questioning the club’s turnover if it wasn’t for the subsistence of the 115 charges. They plainly embolden him and provide a gateway for him to do so. On the basis the relevant charges are dismissed ((or equivalent) I also have no doubt that he will desist from questioning the numbers and/or will be restrained from so doing by the legal bods at the various broadcasters he works for. Given all that, if those charges are dismissed, I wonder what steps (if any) the club will take against him personally, given what he has repeatedly said has gone beyond the routine nods, winks and innuendo.

Maybe they’ll just leave it, or simply be happy to accept a public apology, but I do think he’s exposed himself in a way that pretty much the rest of his cohort haven’t.

He’s so out of sync (or out of touch!) with it all, as well.

2022-23 - when we had a higher revenue than Madrid - isn’t even in the years of the 115 case. Yet he’s talking as if it is.

Plus, even when we look at that season, Madrid only got £129m from La Liga TV revenue. That’s the same as what Brentford got that season in the Prem.

Prem TV revenue is larger than La Liga and Bundesliga combined.

In terms of adding the likes of United and Liverpool to Madrid; City have a completely different business model to them. While they have bigger fanbases, globally, that would only go as far as shirt sales which is tiny money, and in most countries is from the fakes industry anyway. Two of them only have brand reach from having their most successful eras decades ago.
City have a current group of teams under our umbrella across the globe and we are currently in the midst of our most successful era. We are an active business presence in most continents and our reach is contemporary. We have a different more modern kind of reach for sponsors that they don’t have.

They live in the past as fans, but their clubs are operated like it’s the past n’all.

 

[Protein Junkie]

If you look in the Oxford English Dictionary for the definition of the word Narcissist it says
“Jamie Carragher”