PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I know I know, these seem like genuine documents but I'm not sure what they're actually telling us.

Any chance of a brief explanation whenever you're next on @slbsn ? The ones by Harris &/Or MH.

Thanks!
Old documents that very much present questions City will have had to answer for many years and at the hearing. And almost certainly real documents. If they are proven to mean what some infer they mean, it would likely mean everybody who was a witness at CAS outright lied under oath about funding.

In short, City must have answers to these documents as they will need to in respect of others. That is why there is a 10-12 week hearing.
 
Old documents that very much present questions City will have had to answer for many years and at the hearing. And almost certainly real documents. If they are proven to mean what some infer they mean, it would likely mean everybody who was a witness at CAS outright lied under oath about funding.

In short, City must have answers to these documents as they will need to in respect of others. That is why there is a 10-12 week hearing.
Thanks, these weren't used by UEFA at CAS or during their investigation?

Like you say, answers to these must come under the umbrella of a "comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence"!
 
FFS if we lose this case the Sheik and his country's reputation is going to be hammered.

I would think he and any other of the senior people involved would be more than happy to rock up to the tribunal.
H.H has been involved in larger court cases without showing up, same with other prominent members of UAE royal family's.
 
FFS if we lose this case the Sheik and his country's reputation is going to be hammered.

I would think he and any other of the senior people involved would be more than happy to rock up to the tribunal.
If things havent gone well in the case then I would imagine SM will be distancing himself away from the case as far as possible.

We have to win on the major charges - the alternative is really unthinkable.
 
Old documents that very much present questions City will have had to answer for many years and at the hearing. And almost certainly real documents. If they are proven to mean what some infer they mean, it would likely mean everybody who was a witness at CAS outright lied under oath about funding.

In short, City must have answers to these documents as they will need to in respect of others. That is why there is a 10-12 week hearing.

That surely has to be a ridiculous notion that everybody lied under oath at the cas hearing?
 
Based on his string of posts in his latest Twitter thread, Tolmie seems to not understand how FFP/PSR works.

Makes me slightly worried that everybody is hanging on his words around how the 115 case is going.
Do you wear a black cape and carry a scythe round with you?

I think death would run a mile if he met you.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.