That's the way,
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
It is spirituality that is hard wired into humans as you demonstrate here. Religion is an offshoot invented by whomsoever and is often just a load of dogma, not spiritual at all.When I walk in a forest, or look out to sea, or look at the stars, I may feel wonder or love. It is the basis for poetry, music, the arts. That is not the same thing as religious belief.
In your opinion, top people?Very likely at least 2 former Court of Appeal/Supreme Court judges plus maybe someone with an accounting qualification
What's your expectation on how long it should take and on what experience is that based on? It seems over 1 million documents were submitted and CAS took 5 months to come to a decision and that case wwas somewhat smaller. I doubt those involved in the day to day ruuning of the club are at the WCC.I don't understand what the hold up is here any longer.
There's no way they can still be deliberating or writing up the findings/result, or whatever they do.
If the Premier League were sitting on it and waiting to after the season to announce it then they should have done so by now, in a quiet period and also when City's staff are out of the country.
They'd hardly want to wait to the eve of the new season to announce.
A total shit show.
First of all we were told the earlier it comes out in the new year the better it is for City.
Then it would be the February international break
Then March (think Pep said this himself)
Then Easter
Then the summer after the season ends
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,916
Then stop posting about it and complain to Ric if you don't like mod's decisions.
You know, like the Rules say that you want us to implement stricter.
How do we know @Ric exists? He seems all powerful on here, but personally I have never encountered him.
I would be grateful for some thoughts on how the energy levels of higher dimensional spacetime, the strengths and weaknesses of abiogenesis from the conclusions of Miller-Urey and the logarithmic sized gaps between SM and Planck sizes affect our understanding of the existence of Ric.
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 18,084
42How do we know @Ric exists? He seems all powerful on here, but personally I have never encountered him.
I would be grateful for some thoughts on how the energy levels of higher dimensional spacetime, the strengths and weaknesses of abiogenesis from the conclusions of Miller-Urey and the logarithmic sized gaps between SM and Planck sizes affect our understanding of the existence of Ric.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,916
In your opinion, top people?
All cunts, apart from the accountant.
bluemonkey71
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 7,541
View attachment 160951
My favourite bit was the idea that a football club has "infiltrated" Grok until someone pointed out "YOU PROMISED ME!"
What an absolute weapon.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,916
So either all the other club's Boards are a bit thick and lacking acumen... or united are breaking the rules and the PL are allowing them to get away with it.That's where my thought process took me
bluemonkey71
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 7,541
Unfair. @Damocles makes some good points. Occasionally.
low blow, you better hide :)
Resurrection Joe...
Well-Known Member
I think Cicero described Damocles as... a courtier who envied the king's luxurious life.Unfair. @Damocles makes some good points. Occasionally.
Make of that what you will, Ric.
Lots of stuff that millions believed has been rightly dismissed as nonsense.You're conflating religious feelings (i.e. spirituality) with religious dogma (i.e. beliefs). Only the first bit is biological.
No, the idea wasn't to point to gaps in scientific knowledge, it was point out that when someone says "well I've weighed up the evidence", usually when they ask them they seem to have very little idea of the complexities.
And that's wrong which is sort of my point. The Earth is a minimum age of 4.49 billion years which is a different thing. Not only is there a margin of error, but generally when scientists date things they're pretty careful in stating that's the new minimum rather than exact. Because tomorrow if they find a 4.8 billion year old rock then that becomes the new minimum.
My overall point here isn't about ages of the Earth, it's about the complete dismissal of what has been a major part of life for almost every human being who has ever lived because they misunderstand what the Big Bang says or whatever. Or they target one religion and interpretation of it like saying "well it wasn't made in 6 days therefore..." and dismissing the entire notion of spiritual thought based on it. It's close minded at best.
And ultimately, proclaiming yourself as "knowing" that everybody else's beliefs are completely fake and invented and you KNOW the truth makes you sound a ****.
-The earth was the centre of the universe and the sun went round it.
-The atom was the smallest part of an element.
- Fill in your own example.
Religion cannot claim special immunity from questioning just because many have believed in it.
Last edited:
Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,827
It's an AI chat bot like ChatGPT. He's trying to get it to look at the Der Spiegel emails and tell him that City are guilty but it won't so he kicked of at it.
It isn't really much of a contest, it seems to me.
Artifical Intelligence vs Organic Stupidity.
plattlanebenches
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jun 2018
- Messages
- 1,488
He’s in a corner behind a curtain like the wizard of OzHow do we know @Ric exists? He seems all powerful on here, but personally I have never encountered him.
I would be grateful for some thoughts on how the energy levels of higher dimensional spacetime, the strengths and weaknesses of abiogenesis from the conclusions of Miller-Urey and the logarithmic sized gaps between SM and Planck sizes affect our understanding of the existence of Ric.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,916
He’s in a corner behind a curtain like the wizard of Oz
Finally, something I can believe in.
Lord Blue
Well-Known Member
How do we know @Ric exists? He seems all powerful on here, but personally I have never encountered him.
I would be grateful for some thoughts on how the energy levels of higher dimensional spacetime, the strengths and weaknesses of abiogenesis from the conclusions of Miller-Urey and the logarithmic sized gaps between SM and Planck sizes affect our understanding of the existence of Ric.
i think Ric exists, therefore he does.
I know Ric exists because millions believe he does. That is absolute proof.How do we know @Ric exists? He seems all powerful on here, but personally I have never encountered him.
I would be grateful for some thoughts on how the energy levels of higher dimensional spacetime, the strengths and weaknesses of abiogenesis from the conclusions of Miller-Urey and the logarithmic sized gaps between SM and Planck sizes affect our understanding of the existence of Ric.
Hmmmm that's a tough oneSo either all the other club's Boards are a bit thick and lacking acumen... or united are breaking the rules and the PL are allowing them to get away with it.
Proof of madness.It's an AI chat bot like ChatGPT. He's trying to get it to look at the Der Spiegel emails and tell him that City are guilty but it won't so he kicked of at it.