PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Nicholas van Whatsisface said:
You do realise any delays to publication of the judgement on this don’t sit with either City or the EPL, don’t you?

It’s currently sitting with the independent judiciary panel, led by Murray Rosen, to write up their findings and make their judgement based on the evidence provided.

So if you want to be pissed off at anyone - there’s your target.

Both City and the PL have presented their respective cases, and completed their role in the process.

They can’t influence the panel from this point, and are in no position to update on timelines of publication.
Click to expand...
I’ll take your word for it

If you know this then it wouldn’t do any harm for the club to issue a similar statement

I’m sure your shouldn’t be held accountable for informing everyone lol
 
DelToro said:
Yep.

If the 115 charges are upheld all your city memories will erased.

And, as per Total Recall, you will have new memories inserted which will explain your recollection of bouncing round the room wearing a red shirt when utd won the league in 2012 in injury time in the last game of the season.
Click to expand...
Doug Quaid likes this post !!
( Get your ass to Mars) !!
 
I’m late to the party on the APT stuff so have a couple of questions.

1 - are other teams and their fans pissed off by this settlement?

2 - how hard or soft should my signal be right now?
 
On the face of it we’ve allowed ourselves to be compromised again. We correctly challenged something which was founded to be illegal

The challenge clearly costs us millions exactly how many is not reported we also were directly victimised and lost revenues due to having to put off our agreed sponsorship deals

Then we get this appalling short announcement and learn a few hours later we are going to “ask” ffs the PL to consider a new Etihad sponsorship deal, which the BBC emphasised will require due diligence and we are not owed any favours ffs

I still want to believe we are calling all the shots behind the scenes and especially in the preparation of a face saving outcome for the PL on the 115 charges which strangely is now being called the “over 100” charges by most media outlets tonight
 
TShed said:
On the face of it we’ve allowed ourselves to be compromised again. We correctly challenged something which was founded to be illegal

The challenge clearly costs us millions exactly how many is not reported we also were directly victimised and lost revenues due to having to put off our agreed sponsorship deals

Then we get this appalling short announcement and learn a few hours later we are going to “ask” ffs the PL to consider a new Etihad sponsorship deal, which the BBC emphasised will require due diligence and we are not owed any favours ffs

I still want to believe we are calling all the shots behind the scenes and especially in the preparation of a face saving outcome for the PL on the 115 charges which strangely is now being called the “over 100” charges by most media outlets tonight
Click to expand...

Are you citing the BBC as a credible source?
 
nijinsky69 said:
PL to withdraw 115 charges and issue (agreed) statement that having heard the evidence from both sides they now accept no wrongdoing by City….???
Click to expand...
And neither party are going to discuss this further so don’t ask statement
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top