I don't think that is entirely true. It was a change to a current rule which we challenged no? All when Newcastle was taken over and we won as it was claimed to be unlawful. That wasn't anything to do with the 115. It was after the date range of our charges so that isn't part of the 115, not complying to an unlawful rule.Some of them targeted rules have been shown to be illegal as well so will we be punished retrospectively for illegal rules?
Also our non cooperation was to prevent those illegal rules hitting us.