blue-squarepants
Active Member
- Joined
- 17 Feb 2014
- Messages
- 36
NK should have come on for WB end off, if for anything other then he needed more match time as striker going off was holding hamstring and not going to be playing for while
NK should have come on for WB end off, if for anything other then he needed more match time as striker going off was holding hamstring and not going to be playing for while
On the other hand, we were all over them at that point and it was a fair bet to continue with the same attack anticipating that the breakthrough would eventually come.
I am not saying Kelechi couldn't have come on earlier - more that you could argue it both ways, and if Sterling or KDB had buried either of those chances, everyone would have lauded MP for a creative approach.
Most of the arguments against MP seem to be that "Kelechi is the specialist". Well yes, that's the label on the tin (whether primary or secondary striker), but that doesn't mean that at 18 years old with 1 PL goal, he is a better finisher than 2 attacking midfielders with 12 goals at almost 1 every 2 games this year. Secondly, Sterling and KDB are among our best movers off the ball. Who is to say Kelechi would have been as adept at getting into those goal scoing positions if he had been on?
A whole load of ifs, buts and random assumptions from some who either think we should win every game by divine right, or just want any excuse to lambaste our Manager
New kid on the blockwell done Cameron Matthews
MP will push to loan him out so he can get one.Definitely should get a start soon....