Player topic: Sergio Aguero (2015/16)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bang on...pretty sure there's a few closet rags lurking on this thread...either that or they are fucking clueless cunts

What is it with the amount of bellends on this site who refers to anyone who disagrees with them as clueless cunts or rags.

Maybe I just want what's best for the club and my opinion on that is a fit fucking striker or someone who we don't have to rest in a very important premier league game incase the other team have too many big men who might kick him.

Along with Silva he's been our best player for years, but he's now unreliable in terms of fitness and like others have said even when he's available he usually takes 4 or 5 games to get back to his best. Recently he's not even lasted 4 or 5 games to get himself fully fit.
 
What is it with the amount of bellends on this site who refers to anyone who disagrees with them as clueless cunts or rags.

Maybe I just want what's best for the club and my opinion on that is a fit fucking striker or someone who we don't have to rest in a very important premier league game incase the other team have too many big men who might kick him.

Along with Silva he's been our best player for years, but he's now unreliable in terms of fitness and like others have said even when he's available he usually takes 4 or 5 games to get back to his best. Recently he's not even lasted 4 or 5 games to get himself fully fit.

If you're a blue...you're a fucking disgrace
 
What is it with the amount of bellends on this site who refers to anyone who disagrees with them as clueless cunts or rags.

Maybe I just want what's best for the club and my opinion on that is a fit fucking striker or someone who we don't have to rest in a very important premier league game incase the other team have too many big men who might kick him.

Along with Silva he's been our best player for years, but he's now unreliable in terms of fitness and like others have said even when he's available he usually takes 4 or 5 games to get back to his best. Recently he's not even lasted 4 or 5 games to get himself fully fit.
'A very important Premier League game'? Against Stoke?

'Nearly always injured'? When he's demonstrably not.

You seem compelled to express yourself in using excessive and overstated language, which doesn't help your argument.
 
'A very important Premier League game'? Against Stoke?

'Nearly always injured'? When he's demonstrably not.

You seem compelled to express yourself in using excessive and overstated language, which doesn't help your argument.

Yes a very important premier league game. We drew 0-0 at Villa, 0-0 at United and been thumped 4-1 at Spurs in recent away games. If you don't think it's vital we get back to winning ways and get our form sorted ASAP that's fair enough, but I do. I see tomorrow as far more important than Tuesday night, when even a win probably won't make a difference to where we'll finish in our CL group.

I retract nearly always injured and I'll replace it with very rarely fully fit. Does that sound any better? The point remains that as an much as he's one of the best football players in the world, his injuries ARE a problem for us.
 
'A very important Premier League game'? Against Stoke?

'Nearly always injured'? When he's demonstrably not.

You seem compelled to express yourself in using excessive and overstated language, which doesn't help your argument.

I dont see a lot wrong with what he said tbh,
Theres far worse on the kompany thread wanting him sold and he's less injured than Aguero.
 
MP is playing safe with Kun , why risk him against the likes of Stoke , players like charlie adam , walters , bardsley , shawcross take great delight in scything down talented players , (although playing Silva is also a big risk , but we need his invention to unlock defences) , quite sure if we were playing a top 4 club tomorrow , then Kun would be starting , but he is too important to our season , to let Stoke's yard dogs have a free for all.
 
'A very important Premier League game'? Against Stoke?

'Nearly always injured'? When he's demonstrably not.

You seem compelled to express yourself in using excessive and overstated language, which doesn't help your argument.
It is a very important game, more important than Tuesday.
 
Yes a very important premier league game. We drew 0-0 at Villa, 0-0 at United and been thumped 4-1 at Spurs in recent away games. If you don't think it's vital we get back to winning ways and get our form sorted ASAP that's fair enough, but I do. I see tomorrow as far more important than Tuesday night, when even a win probably won't make a difference to where we'll finish in our CL group.
Everything's relative and in relative terms tomorrow's game is not 'very important Premier League game'. Arsenal away is very important. The Derby was very important.
You know we're top of the league, right?
I retract nearly always injured and I'll replace it with very rarely fully fit. Does that sound any better?
It sounds more accurate, if that assists.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.