Dyed Petya
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 May 2007
- Messages
- 1,490
neil jung said:Yet we happily paid £350,000 for Paul Futcher. The mind boggles with City sometimes.Dyed Petya said:There's a truth that we wanted Dalglish and ended up with Channon, I believe. However, I don't think it's quite as simple as that we simply thought Channon was better.
Liverpool - who'd just sold Keegan to Hamburg for a record GBP 500K - outbid us. They paid GBP 440K for Dalglish, when the previous record between two British clubs stood at GBP 350K. We couldn't or wouldn't spend that amount and so went for Channon instead, who cost 'only' GBP 300K (still a very big wedge by market standards in 1977).
That was a year later, and in mitigation the transfer market explosion of the late seventies had just started to get under way in that year. City also had enjoyed a second season of 40,000 plus average gates, also, proving that the increase in matchday support from 1976/7 wasn't just a flash in the pan, so Swales maybe0 felt more secure in being able to rely on income from big gates to pay big fees.
But whatever excuses you try and make, you're absolutely right. We got well and truly mugged by Luton over Paul Futcher!