You're kidding yourself if you think we're getting Wilfried Ndidi to come and be a backup. Might as well sign Van Dijk to come and cover for Stones while we're at it.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Players who might improve us
- Thread starter FantasyIreland
- Start date
-
- Tags
- steven nzonzi
You're kidding yourself if you think we're getting Wilfried Ndidi to come and be a backup. Might as well sign Van Dijk to come and cover for Stones while we're at it.
OccupiedPalestineBlues
Well-Known Member
We have our Fernandinho replacement- his name is Rodri. People need to get used to that because it's happening. No, it's already happened. I know City fans don't like him but he'll prove everyone wrong just as Gundogan, Mahrez and Stones have.
That should be ‘some’ City fans.
I like him a lot, I think he’s got better and better as he’s settled into the side and I think he’ll be better yet again next season.
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
My comment had nothing to do with NdidiYou're kidding yourself if you think we're getting Wilfried Ndidi to come and be a backup. Might as well sign Van Dijk to come and cover for Stones while we're at it.
My comment had nothing to do with Ndidi
Of course it did. Someone said we need Ndidi to replace Fernandinho and I pointed out we've already replaced Fernandinho.
eastmanc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 8,124
- Team supported
- Manchester city
I’m not saying we’re getting Ndidi I’m saying we need back up, I didn’t mention Ndidi. Who do you suggest we get?You're kidding yourself if you think we're getting Wilfried Ndidi to come and be a backup. Might as well sign Van Dijk to come and cover for Stones while we're at it.
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
You said we didn’t need a Fernandinho replacement because we have Rodri. I said we still need a second player for when he’s injured or when we’re rotating. I didn’t say it had to be NdidiOf course it did. Someone said we need Ndidi to replace Fernandinho and I pointed out we've already replaced Fernandinho.
You said we didn’t need a Fernandinho replacement because we have Rodri. I said we still need a second player for when he’s injured or when we’re rotating. I didn’t say it had to be Ndidi
I’m not saying we’re getting Ndidi I’m saying we need back up, I didn’t mention Ndidi. Who do you suggest we get?
Our Fernandinho replacement is Rodri. We need another player yes but if we're suggesting people like Ndidi then quite clearly the feeling is that Rodri isn't good enough. Which is utter bollocks.
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
Fernandinho is Rodri’s second right now. So we need a Fernandinho replacement literallyOur Fernandinho replacement is Rodri.
Fernandinho is Rodri’s second right now. So we need a Fernandinho replacement literally
But I'm not talking to you- I'm talking to the guy who thinks we should replace Fernandinho with Ndidi. Why everyone thinks I'm saying we should never buy another DM again is beyond me.
Legal Alien
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2021
- Messages
- 3,595
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I agree but we will need cover for him.Our Fernandinho replacement is Rodri. We need another player yes but if we're suggesting people like Ndidi then quite clearly the feeling is that Rodri isn't good enough. Which is utter bollocks.
We have a £25mill buy back option on Douglas Luiz, so unless we can buy someone cheaper than that, we get him in imo.