SamTheGuru
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 3,932
- Team supported
- MCFC OK
Maicon or maybe Sylvinho.
Why are you banging on about Saka?! We’ve not even been linked with him and whilst decent, he’s very much overrated! (”symbol of your club” / “spearhead of your resurgence” - fuck me, you are dramatic)Even if he were to move. If it took 100m for you to prise Grealish from Villa. I dont even want to think of what it would take to prise Saka away.
For instance, we had 90m lined up for Mudryk. If we were prepared to make a risqué signing like that, whats 100m for Saka who is the symbol of the club? Not a fly on a horse.
So if City were serious about it. To have a bid accepted, the bid would have to be absolutely nuclear. Because a 100m bid for Saka would be pissed on by Arsenal.
This massive upward trajectory you’re talking about…..are you thinking the Fa cup you won nearly 3 years ago? Or the CL knock out stages ? Oh sorry you’re not in it, if you where there’s no way you’d be top, the stars have aligned for you this season there’s no doubt, and if you did win it, it would be more Leicester City than Manchester City (4 in 5) but you’ve won naff all yet, I hope you have the good grace to pop back if Pep guides the blues to 5 in 6, AFTV campaign to get Mikel the sack, you’ve turned on Xhaka again, your crowds are back to 35’000, selling your best players and you return to being banter fcSaka new deal with Arsenal is pretty much done. Were offering him 200k a week which is similar to the deal Foden got. He is a london lad and genuine Arsenal fan. There are picture of him as a 5-6-7-8 year old wearing Arsenal kits ect. You cant/wont offer him any more money than we will. Wheres the pull? Whats the rational for him leaving Arsenal when we are on a massive upward trajectory, and he is central to this happening? He is a youth product of the club and the most beloved player at the club.
This isnt the early 2010's anymore. We wouldn't sell you Saka any more than Liverpool would have sold you Salah.
You’re on a thread titled “players who might improve us”, which is speculative opinions from City fans on Manchester City… and you’ve been banging on about Saka, Martinelli, your resurgence, and all sorts of nonsense! You’re clearly buoyed by the fact you’re top of the league - but come back at the end of May. Until then, kindly fuck off!!Even if he were to move. If it took 100m for you to prise Grealish from Villa. I dont even want to think of what it would take to prise Saka away.
For instance, we had 90m lined up for Mudryk. If we were prepared to make a risqué signing like that, whats 100m for Saka who is the symbol of the club? Not a fly on a horse.
So if City were serious about it. To have a bid accepted, the bid would have to be absolutely nuclear. Because a 100m bid for Saka would be pissed on by Arsenal.
He'll be gone by MayWhy are you banging on about Saka?! We’ve not even been linked with him and whilst decent, he’s very much overrated! (”symbol of your club” / “spearhead of your resurgence” - fuck me, you are dramatic)
Can you just get back in your box and fuck off please?! Do you spend as much time on whatever Arsenal forum you frequent, or is it just us that get that pleasure?
Unfortunately they're mostly all Chelsea's scouts now. They raided Brighton for more than Potter and Cucurella in the summer.The scouts at Brighton. Mitoma, Caicedo and McAllister are all top class. Estupinan, Ben White, Trossard and Cucurella were also very successful signigns
Not more than average in possession or offensive skills...Brighton did a number on Chelsea