hilts
Well-Known Member
I believe j gave you a reason why people may do it not that they necessarily should. Anyhow if it means dodgy fuckers get in tte gamble failed, if it means the current big two worry and maybe change then it worked. And that's if you believe the current lot aren't dodgy.If the only warning being sent is ‘I’m angry,’ and the vehicle for that warning is a party with no serious policies or moral compass, it risks strengthening something much worse than the status quo. History is full of protest votes that went too far and ended up setting the house on fire.
If Reform is the protest vote of choice, then it’s not just Westminster that’s in trouble, it’s public standards. When we start mistaking shouting for strategy, chaos for change, and recklessness for rebellion, we stop being a frustrated electorate and start being complicit in the farce. Reform isn’t a message to the system it’s a declaration by some voters that they have given up on serious solutions and are now willing to trade credibility for noise.
I'll add that if someone says something daft and ill-thought-out, they’re going to get a response. That’s not censorship, it’s consequences.
Arguing about which of the two main parties are the worse when there are so close together doesnf seem worth the effort.
We have risk averse politicians and voters unfortunately.




