BillCarlisle
Well-Known Member
Well, Fellow Blues, it seems like I opened up a hornet's nest with my OP, but that of course was my intention.
In addition to those of us in EL3 who would be well pissed off if we are moved , it hasn't surprised me that there are also many South Standers who believe that it would be the right thing to do. Whilst I obviously disagree, I also accept that everyone is entitled to an opinion.
I would expect that like many SC Holders in EL3, a hell of a lot of our counterparts in the South Stand sit/stand there because that's the part of the ground where they prefer to be.
If we are moved from EL3 to other parts of the ground it would inconvenience thousands of fans, and not only those being relocated. If things stayed as they are it would inconvenience very few, if any, fans at all.
In addition to the dubious logistics of access, exit, catering, toilets, security etc in EL3 it seems to me that the argument of 'One End' is based purely on the wish of fans to have their 'One End' and as an earlier poster put it, never mind anything else. Never mind the fans in EL 1 & 2 who it would also effect one way or another (access, exit, potential crowd disturbance from above etc).
There is no certainty that the atmosphere will change as a result (indeed the Villareal experiment indicated otherwise). Plus, I'm sure it would do nothing to make the many thousands who leave early change their ways.
(For the record, I'm not one of them, neither do I take a flask or butties to the game).
Do the many of us who have prime seats in EL3 relish the thought of being shunted possibly into a lower row in the SS1 ? Of course we don't. Put yourselves into our positions for a moment, guys - how would you feel if the boot was on the other foot ?
The most sensible solution IMO is as an earlier poster suggested : Wait until the stadium is extended and then make proper provision for Away fans without all these hit & miss suggestions to make do and mend. You would then no doubt have your 'One End' and we could all continue to enjoy our football.
In addition to those of us in EL3 who would be well pissed off if we are moved , it hasn't surprised me that there are also many South Standers who believe that it would be the right thing to do. Whilst I obviously disagree, I also accept that everyone is entitled to an opinion.
I would expect that like many SC Holders in EL3, a hell of a lot of our counterparts in the South Stand sit/stand there because that's the part of the ground where they prefer to be.
If we are moved from EL3 to other parts of the ground it would inconvenience thousands of fans, and not only those being relocated. If things stayed as they are it would inconvenience very few, if any, fans at all.
In addition to the dubious logistics of access, exit, catering, toilets, security etc in EL3 it seems to me that the argument of 'One End' is based purely on the wish of fans to have their 'One End' and as an earlier poster put it, never mind anything else. Never mind the fans in EL 1 & 2 who it would also effect one way or another (access, exit, potential crowd disturbance from above etc).
There is no certainty that the atmosphere will change as a result (indeed the Villareal experiment indicated otherwise). Plus, I'm sure it would do nothing to make the many thousands who leave early change their ways.
(For the record, I'm not one of them, neither do I take a flask or butties to the game).
Do the many of us who have prime seats in EL3 relish the thought of being shunted possibly into a lower row in the SS1 ? Of course we don't. Put yourselves into our positions for a moment, guys - how would you feel if the boot was on the other foot ?
The most sensible solution IMO is as an earlier poster suggested : Wait until the stadium is extended and then make proper provision for Away fans without all these hit & miss suggestions to make do and mend. You would then no doubt have your 'One End' and we could all continue to enjoy our football.