Post counts

But isnt that my point, why should I or anyone else be "jumped on" because the post count is low, and why should what we have to say be "crap" because the post count is low? What i said wasnt, as you put it, crap, it is a valid point. Despite your assertion that you "dont do that" you have decided that my post was crap because I have a low post count, validating my point further.
When you join a community you don't start off insulting them with what you wrote,we don't know you so you will get a negative reaction,human nature
 
But isnt that my point, why should I or anyone else be "jumped on" because the post count is low, and why should what we have to say be "crap" because the post count is low? What i said wasnt, as you put it, crap, it is a valid point. Despite your assertion that you "dont do that" you have decided that my post was crap because I have a low post count, validating my point further.
Tbh I think she thinks that your post is crap because she thinks it's crap, not that it's crap because you have a low post count, I think
 
Tbh I think she thinks that your post is crap because she thinks it's crap, not that it's crap because you have a low post count, I think

oh thats ok, its not crap my point has been validated twice already but ok whatever keeps those with a high post count happy.
 
Can any of the Mods share what problem they are trying to solve by this action and whether they genuinely believe it will make any difference bearing in mind on another click of a mouse, that information is there?

There is obviously passion on both sides for this, so wouldn't a win win be the ability to either enable or disable it?


Duc is correct in that in life, change is one of the most hardest things to implement, but without understanding why this has occured (and I appreciate your response might be "none of our business"), it was inevitible that many would become vocal.

I posted the above earlier, and would be greatful if one of the MoDs would answer the first part
 
Duc is correct in that in life, change is one of the most hardest things to implement, but without understanding why this has occured (and I appreciate your response might be "none of our business"), it was inevitible that many would become vocal.

I posted the above earlier, and would be greatful if one of the MoDs would answer the first part
Sorry mate I can't answer your question for you, although I have replied to some of your earlier posts
 
Not at all I made a post that other people disagree with, they used the fact that I have a low post count as an excuse for suggesting that anything I have to say is crap and will be jumped on. People who are now clicking on the user name to see a post count before they reply have the obsession not me. I couldnt care less how many posts someone makes it makes them neither a better or worse person that the next and what they each have to say should be judged on content rather than quantity.
 
I'm not fussed either way.

A low post count is irrelevant for me, talking shite is the red flag.

However, if little tweaks are perhaps being implemented, could we see the return of distinguishing what threads we've posted in?
 
hit-the-nail-on-the-head.jpg

What it is, is utter shit. As Billy has already explained, he and others (including me) don't give a shit about our own post counts. If you want to pretend that we do in order to divert attention away from the real (and clearly stated over the course of the last 21 pages) reasons people would prefer to keep the post count visible, good luck to you. Classic straw man stuff......
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.