Post Match Thread: Election 2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
it is an investment, one for which the individual should pay for if they want a better future, just like the current and previous generation have had to with little hardship.

Any other format is just a generational bias tax on those who were born at the wrong time and is completely discriminatory against that generation in the workforce, who will have to pay for both the generation before and generations after to have a nice time without earning it and for free.

previous generation average loan was less than £15,000. the current generation are looking at £40,000
the generation before that had no loans at all.

your post makes no sense.
 
No problem if the Labour manifesto protected it to ensure it was on similar terms to before the Tories started messing with the bold, but they pay back their tuition fees themselves if they can afford to. Labour could have done a million things that would have been genuinely caring and compassionate, but decided to bribe youngsters and buy votes with an answer that is utterly selfish, and yes, poor people should not be put off by a debt they don't have to pay back unless they're no longer poor, self-explanatory.


no it's the one who had to pay for it because your generation decided you could have it free, but we couldn't. Then the generations above also decided they deserved a triple lock on their pensions whilst we have far worse pension schemes and have to work longer, and the supposed man of the people from the generations above decided the generations below could have their uni free. Wonder who pays for it all? Oh yeah, my generation.

as long as they trust the goverments for the next 45 years not to change the rules.
How has that worked out in the past?
 
You want your cake and eat it - if we had carried on spending would the debt be less? Most of those points are subjective. Anyone who thinks things are worse now than 2008 is utterly deluded.

Have you seen the level of government debt and the way it keeps growing?

£1.8 Trillion and counting!

Incredible isnt it given the austerity this Tory government has heaped on those least able to afford it.

I wonder where the money is going?
 
I have 3 degree or above qualifications and paid for them myself either out of pocket or through student loans which have been repaid so I'm not sure exactly who you think you're talking to when "I decided I could have it free".



Because when you went it was manageable. Now kids can walk out of Uni with potentially £100,000 of debt.



Yes, Tony Blair wanted the populace to be educated which leads to more innovation, more high rate taxpayers and less people stuck in a cycle of poverty inside ghettos. How stupid of him. Shouldn't let the serfs read.

Stop exaggerating. When I went to uni you can get part time jobs and summer jobs you know to help pay your way? Or is it mandatory that taxpayers have to pay for everything Fees, digs, booze money, Sky tv?

I am not sure some of the courses really are innovative . We didn't get more mathematicians doctors and scientists , just more arts students and "modern courses. " like American studies and media studies.

Before you start I was born in moston and went to a shit school and got no help. Had to pay my way , fees were free but my lpc I had to pay the fees for as post grad. Funded through loans and now paid back as I thought it best that I didn't get my north Manchester mates who didn't go to university pay for me to have the privilege of the experience.
 
Have you seen the level of government debt and the way it keeps growing?

£1.8 Trillion and counting!

Incredible isnt it given the austerity this Tory government has heaped on those least able to afford it.

I wonder where the money is going?


to be fair the tories did cut tax for some people, its just you had to be earning over £150,000 a year to benefit
we are all in it together apparantly
 
Stop exaggerating. When I went to uni you can get part time jobs and summer jobs you know to help pay your way? Or is it mandatory that taxpayers have to pay for everything Fees, digs, booze money, Sky tv?

I am not sure some of the courses really are innovative . We didn't get more mathematicians doctors and scientists , just more arts students and "modern courses. " like American studies and media studies.

Before you start I was born in moston and went to a shit school and got no help. Had to pay my way , fees were free but my lpc I had to pay the fees for as post grad. Funded through loans and now paid back as I thought it best that I didn't get my north Manchester mates who didn't go to university pay for me to have the privilege of the experience.


you didnt pay your way then did you, you didnt pay undergrad fees
no mainstream party is arguing for free postgrad courses

your posts are a mass of contradictions
 
Last edited:
as long as they trust the goverments for the next 45 years not to change the rules.
How has that worked out in the past?
My other post made perfect sense. Expecting the middle generation(s) to pay for young and old to have fun for free is just discrimination. It's not a fair society.

RE: This post, so basically you're saying people can't trust the Government unless they give it away for free. Sums it up. All take, no personal responsibility.

"oh, I can't pay for my own education like everyone else, I have to be handed it on a plate because it's such a big number that I'll never pay-off unless I can afford to".

Just stinks.
 
Interesting that the more educated you are, the more likely to vote Labour and the less educated you are, the more likely you are to vote Tory. Notice that the highest Labour voting bloc were those that have finished University and not those IN University. I'd argue that many people who went to Uni understand the social and economic good that it brings to the country as a whole and are willing to sacrifice a small amount of their taxes to ensure access to higher education is as low cost and free as possible.


Education-01.png

Just shows that Labour voters liked dicking about at uni.




...That's a joke by the way
 
it is an investment, one for which the individual should pay for if they want a better future, just like the current and previous generation have had to with little hardship.

Any other format is just a generational bias tax on those who were born at the wrong time and is completely discriminatory against that generation in the workforce, who will have to pay for both the generation before and generations after to have a nice time without earning it and for free.

Then I look forward to companies and businesses up and down the UK turning down govt grants. I don't see why I should fund their better future. Bunch of leeches sucking on the Govt teat. Sheesh - Tories subsidising their mates and yuking it up later over G&T's.
 
Interesting that the more educated you are, the more likely to vote Labour and the less educated you are, the more likely you are to vote Tory. Notice that the highest Labour voting bloc were those that have finished University and not those IN University. I'd argue that many people who went to Uni understand the social and economic good that it brings to the country as a whole and are willing to sacrifice a small amount of their taxes to ensure access to higher education is as low cost and free as possible.


Education-01.png

In all seriousness though going to university doesn't mean you're more intelligent or informed. My mate doesn't vote and couldn't even tell you one difference between Corbyn and May, he got a 2:2 in events management. My housemate is slightly less knowledgeable than the rest of my mates and he went to university too.

I like to think of myself as more informed than both and I chose to leave education earlier as I got a good job offer.

I know the data is more in general terms but I don't think it says much.
 
There are better things to spend money on at the moment. When his generation went to university it was only a few now everyone goes practically. Blair wanted everyone to go to uni,

The student loan scheme is the best way of dealing with an impossible situation. There is a finite amount of money you know?

You only start paying it back when you earn over a threshold and it's only a small amount. Btw I had student loans and have paid them back. It's manageable.


how much were your loans were they £40,000, £50,000, £60,000?
 
With all due respect that is nonsense and I will explain why later. In fact i will quickly do now while I wait for my chips in the chippy. People with student debt were bribed to vote labour and more younger people go to university these days doing shit degrees and they are more likely to vote labour than the wiser older generation - I don't need any google or graph to tell me that.
And the Tories threatening to take money off the 'wiser older generation', after years of every party bribing them, because they were the ones that voted, cost them the election.
 
Have you seen the level of government debt and the way it keeps growing?

£1.8 Trillion and counting!

Incredible isnt it given the austerity this Tory government has heaped on those least able to afford it.

I wonder where the money is going?

Yes of course I have seen the debt and applaud the government for trying and successfully reducing our yearly defecit. Please explain to me how spending more on public services will help to reduce that debt? Clearly it can't and won't.

How do you feel about labours manifesto that the national debt would increase significantly more under them than it would under the current government?

As I said - cake and eat it. You can't have it both ways?
 
My other post made perfect sense. Expecting the middle generation(s) to pay for young and old to have fun for free is just discrimination. It's not a fair society.

RE: This post, so basically you're saying people can't trust the Government unless they give it away for free. Sums it up. All take, no personal responsibility.

"oh, I can't pay for my own education like everyone else, I have to be handed it on a plate because it's such a big number that I'll never pay-off unless I can afford to".

Just stinks.

"like everyone else" is bollocks

only those since 1998 have paid and only those since 2010 have paid at least £15,000 a year.

it unfair to ask the older generation to pay for themselves as they have already paid for the previous older generation and the current working generation (who did get the free uni paid for by the current older generation).

and the younger generation now have to pay for their own education and to look after the current working generation when they are old because there is a massive gap in pension funding.

the generation that became adults before 1998 are the selfish cunts if they dont want to fund the young and old, previous generations funded them and future generations will also fund them
 
And the Tories threatening to take money off the 'wiser older generation', after years of every party bribing them, because they were the ones that voted, cost them the election.

Didn't they get the largest vote of a Tory party since thatcher and the most votes and the most seats in the election despite the biggest blackmail of students ever and having to admit to the tough choices we face to get our economy back on track? Or am I missing something?
 
how much were your loans were they £40,000, £50,000, £60,000?

They were probably about 20k at the end.

Anyway , in my day as has been pointed out tuition fees were free. It would be lovely if that was the case today but it isn't. It would be great if everyone in the country got lots of things for free and everything was a million times better than it is at the moment, but back in The real world there is a pot of money that gets dished out and I am not sure scrapping university fees now is the best use of that pot of money. There Are bigger priorities at the moment, like the nhs for example.

I don't hear about universities closing down because of a lack of students. There is still plenty of demand so it may be is working. Hey?
 
Yes of course I have seen the debt and applaud the government for trying and successfully reducing our yearly defecit. Please explain to me how spending more on public services will help to reduce that debt? Clearly it can't and won't.

How do you feel about labours manifesto that the national debt would increase significantly more under them than it would under the current government?

As I said - cake and eat it. You can't have it both ways?

I dont want it both ways.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...since-2010-under-george-osborne-a6947661.html

The truth would be nice?
 
"like everyone else" is bollocks

only those since 1998 have paid and only those since 2010 have paid at least £15,000 a year.

it unfair to ask the older generation to pay for themselves as they have already paid for the previous older generation and the current working generation (who did get the free uni paid for by the current older generation).

and the younger generation now have to pay for their own education and to look after the current working generation when they are old because there is a massive gap in pension funding.

the generation that became adults before 1998 are the selfish cunts if they dont want to fund the young and old, previous generations funded them and future generations will also fund them

so that's 20 years of people paying for themselves then, so that's enough for my assertion to be fair.

Anyone supporting free tuition from now on is just wilfully harming the generation who's already been hung out to dry, it's callous really.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top