Predator drones

TheMightyQuinn said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
TheMightyQuinn said:
So, to stop innocent people being killed we have to kill innocent people? Lovely stuff.
So should we ban cars because they kill innocent people?

No. I don't want to ban cars.

I just don't want to bomb children.

Last time I checked, no one was dropping cars out of planes onto hospitals or schools.

Good comeback though...
Cars will kill children. Therefore in your line of reasoning we have to ban cars. The people who flew planes into buildings or blew themselves up Tube trains had no idea who'd they'd kill. Many children are being tortured and killed in Syria. Therefore to save their lives, should the world intervene?
 
Josh Blue said:
The fact that Prestwich_Blue actually bothered to think up this ridiculous scenario which in no way relates to the use of predator drones is insane, scary and pathetic all at the same time.

It is cowardice act to try and legitimise the killing of any innocent peoples.

Its ok Israel do this everyday.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
TheMightyQuinn said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
So should we ban cars because they kill innocent people?

No. I don't want to ban cars.

I just don't want to bomb children.

Last time I checked, no one was dropping cars out of planes onto hospitals or schools.

Good comeback though...
Cars will kill children. Therefore in your line of reasoning we have to ban cars. The people who flew planes into buildings or blew themselves up Tube trains had no idea who'd they'd kill. Many children are being tortured and killed in Syria. Therefore to save their lives, should the world intervene?

If we did not intervene but it meant that overall less people were killed would that be bad?
 
Scottyboi said:
Josh Blue said:
The fact that Prestwich_Blue actually bothered to think up this ridiculous scenario which in no way relates to the use of predator drones is insane, scary and pathetic all at the same time.

It is cowardice act to try and legitimise the killing of any innocent peoples.

Its ok Israel do this everyday.
You'll be called an anti semitic with statements like that if you're not careful.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
TheMightyQuinn said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
So should we ban cars because they kill innocent people?

No. I don't want to ban cars.

I just don't want to bomb children.

Last time I checked, no one was dropping cars out of planes onto hospitals or schools.

Good comeback though...
Cars will kill children. Therefore in your line of reasoning we have to ban cars. The people who flew planes into buildings or blew themselves up Tube trains had no idea who'd they'd kill. Many children are being tortured and killed in Syria. Therefore to save their lives, should the world intervene?

So terrorists don't know who they'll kill but cars know they'll kill children?

You've got no point.
 
supa-dapa-dan said:
Scottyboi said:
Josh Blue said:
The fact that Prestwich_Blue actually bothered to think up this ridiculous scenario which in no way relates to the use of predator drones is insane, scary and pathetic all at the same time.

It is cowardice act to try and legitimise the killing of any innocent peoples.

Its ok Israel do this everyday.
You'll be called an anti semitic with statements like that if you're not careful.
No he's just an idiot with no knowledge of reality
 
Josh Blue said:
The fact that Prestwich_Blue actually bothered to think up this ridiculous scenario which in no way relates to the use of predator drones is insane, scary and pathetic all at the same time.

It is cowardice act to try and legitimise the killing of any innocent peoples.
It's no more ridiculous than Damocles' scenario that i used it to answer.
 
Scottyboi said:
Josh Blue said:
The fact that Prestwich_Blue actually bothered to think up this ridiculous scenario which in no way relates to the use of predator drones is insane, scary and pathetic all at the same time.

It is cowardice act to try and legitimise the killing of any innocent peoples.

Its ok Israel do this everyday.
Look what's crawled out the woodwork.
 
Josh Blue said:
west didsblue said:
supa-dapa-dan said:
You'll be called an anti semitic with statements like that if you're not careful.
No he's just an idiot with no knowledge of reality

I couldn't blame him for saying the same to you judging on your posts in this thread..
You mean the fact that I debunked your first statement in the original post?
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Scottyboi said:
Josh Blue said:
The fact that Prestwich_Blue actually bothered to think up this ridiculous scenario which in no way relates to the use of predator drones is insane, scary and pathetic all at the same time.

It is cowardice act to try and legitimise the killing of any innocent peoples.

Its ok Israel do this everyday.
Look what's crawled out the woodwork.

You should be happy, it's a good opportunity to deflect the attention away from some of the disgusting and pathetic posts you have made in this thread.<br /><br />-- Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:55 pm --<br /><br />
west didsblue said:
Josh Blue said:
west didsblue said:
No he's just an idiot with no knowledge of reality

I couldn't blame him for saying the same to you judging on your posts in this thread..
You mean the fact that I debunked your first statement in the original post?

Nobody can be sure of the true figures as stats can also be manipulated to suit. I always believe meet in the middle to get a the picture.

Your "debunking" didn't really change anything. Some of your posts have been ignorant and lacked humanity though.
 
Josh Blue said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
Scottyboi said:
Its ok Israel do this everyday.
Look what's crawled out the woodwork.

You should be happy, it's a good opportunity to deflect the attention away from some of the disgusting and pathetic posts you have made in this thread.

It is called a different point of view. I do not agree with him but know that you will always get a better discussion if you have not basically called your opposite a ****.

Imagine if countries did that ;)
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Josh Blue said:
The fact that Prestwich_Blue actually bothered to think up this ridiculous scenario which in no way relates to the use of predator drones is insane, scary and pathetic all at the same time.

It is cowardice act to try and legitimise the killing of any innocent peoples.
It's no more ridiculous than Damocles' scenario that i used it to answer.

Sums up the problem here really.

It's tit for tat.

It's about choosing a side and sticking with it even if it means attempting to legitimize the mass murder of innocent human beings in the name of freedom.

It's OK to bomb them because they flew planes into America. And they think it's OK to fly planes into American because we bomb them.

All the while children die horrifically.

Congratulations, you must be very proud.
 
mindmyp's_n_q's said:
Josh Blue said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
Look what's crawled out the woodwork.

You should be happy, it's a good opportunity to deflect the attention away from some of the disgusting and pathetic posts you have made in this thread.

It is called a different point of view. I do not agree with him but know that you will always get a better discussion if you have not basically called your opposite a ****.

Imagine if countries did that ;)

I enjoy a good discussion but it is wrong for a man to legitimize the death of innocent children because it suits his politics.
 
west didsblue said:
Josh Blue said:
west didsblue said:
No he's just an idiot with no knowledge of reality

I couldn't blame him for saying the same to you judging on your posts in this thread..
You mean the fact that I debunked your first statement in the original post?
Josh is a naive and impressionable teenager (or is not far out of his teens) who doesn't appreciate the fact he lives in a democracy which allows him to state the fact he hates it and its allies. If he lived in Syria, China, had lived in Chile or Argentina in certain eras or lived in a lot of other countries and expressed the same views he would disappear, be tortured and possibly murdered. He's desperately defending the society in places like Pakistan & Afghanistan that murders women who want an education and has the death penalty for the heinous crime of apostasy.

Yet the admittedly imperfect society that allows him his view is the wicked one. No doubt if he lived in one of the societies that encouraged it e would denounce his own parents if they expressed deviant views.<br /><br />-- Sun Apr 28, 2013 1:08 am --<br /><br />
TheMightyQuinn said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
Josh Blue said:
The fact that Prestwich_Blue actually bothered to think up this ridiculous scenario which in no way relates to the use of predator drones is insane, scary and pathetic all at the same time.

It is cowardice act to try and legitimise the killing of any innocent peoples.
It's no more ridiculous than Damocles' scenario that i used it to answer.

Sums up the problem here really.

It's tit for tat.

It's about choosing a side and sticking with it even if it means attempting to legitimize the mass murder of innocent human beings in the name of freedom.

It's OK to bomb them because they flew planes into America. And they think it's OK to fly planes into American because we bomb them.

All the while children die horrifically.

Congratulations, you must be very proud.
And I bet you think you're so cool when you come on and spout your typical mindless drivel.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
west didsblue said:
Josh Blue said:
I couldn't blame him for saying the same to you judging on your posts in this thread..
You mean the fact that I debunked your first statement in the original post?
Josh is a naive and impressionable teenager (or is not far out of his teens) who doesn't appreciate the fact he lives in a democracy which allows him to state the fact he hates it and its allies. If he lived in Syria, China, had lived in Chile or Argentina in certain eras or lived in a lot of other countries and expressed the same views he would disappear, be tortured and possibly murdered. He's desperately defending the society in places like Pakistan & Afghanistan that murders women who want an education and has the death penalty for the heinous crime of apostasy.

Yet the admittedly imperfect society that allows him his view is the wicked one. No doubt if he lived in one of the societies that encouraged it e would denounce his own parents if they expressed deviant views.

I don't know josh so can't comment but maybe he is just like me and does not think of the west as wicked far from it I think it is ace. I just do not think it is right 100% of the time.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
He's desperately defending the society in places like Pakistan & Afghanistan that murders women who want an education and has the death penalty for the heinous crime of apostasy.

No he isn't. He's just saying he's not into killing children.

This isn't about Jews being better than Muslims or vice versa.

-- Sun Apr 28, 2013 1:13 am --

Prestwich_Blue said:
And I bet you think you're so cool when you come on and spout your typical mindless drivel.

Another good comeback.

I wish I had your wit.

Lol and you accuse others of being the children. It'd be funny if it weren't so tragic. Do I get banned now?<br /><br />-- Sun Apr 28, 2013 1:14 am --<br /><br />
mindmyp's_n_q's said:
I don't know josh so can't comment but maybe he is just like me and does not think of the west as wicked far from it I think it is ace. I just do not think it is right 100% of the time.

No.

Josh is an anti semite. A child and very naive.

He disagreed with the BM's very own league of gentlemen so he must be.
 
mindmyp's_n_q's said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
Or in WWII we bombed targets of strategic and tactical importance in Germany and occupied Europe. Civilians died as a result of these raids so, in your little morally certain world, should we not ave done that?

On this point we did have a policy of bombing places of strategic and tactical importance however the reality was that the technology of the day was about as accurate as threading a needle with a hand grenade. On average only 2/3rds of all bombers got withing 5 miles of their target and we hit at around a 1 in 10 ratio. We started to bomb in the day and were cut to pieces so we decide to bomb at night. As one US Airforce general put it (I am remembering the quote here) "We struggled to hit anything in the day so at night we were basically just dropping bombs on anything and everything"

the british used area bombing which was deliberately aimed at the german civilian population with sole purpose of killing enough people so the germans could no longer wage war

this is why Bomber Harris is such a controversial figure
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top