SamBlue
Well-Known Member
We would have already conceded by this point. This would be a winner.Brighton miss a sitter. Guaranteed goal v us
We would have already conceded by this point. This would be a winner.Brighton miss a sitter. Guaranteed goal v us
If hed have got it on target it would have been a goalheh Villa winning now too, and first on target shot from Birghton is not a goal??????????
I can understand why it took a long time to decide if the wolves goal was offside. A check on the ball position and the position of the last dedenders foot, both relative to the wolves player was needed. But I find it very difficult to believe it is accurate. Its a flat still picture. The ball and the players move between frames. How fast they move will affect the results. Is the speed measured? There is apparently no tolerance which is nonsense.Once again a perfectly good goal disallowed for mm offside, using questionable technique when between frames a player can move 18” and no sure way of saying when a ball was played VAR is anti goals the very thing that we want to see Like yesterday again today taking an eternity to decide makes a farce of it, what are they actually doing in the VAR room? Very few want VAR except the officials because it’s a nice earner and a great retirement plan
Offside was introduced to find players mm offside that is not the spirit of the law
5 points behind Arsenal and potentially 6 behind Liverpool after this weekend
And we couldn't hold onto a 2 goals lead to Palace who are out of form
Almost surprising that we are only 5/6 points behind those 2 given how out of it we look
As long as the rags miss.out I.dont care who replaces themVilla having a worldly season going to be a tight top 5