In my opinion, he falls into the same bracket as Mount. That is, a good player who doesn't justify the hype that comes with him.Is rice any good seems nothing special to me
Ok think mounts just above average but he’s damn site better than Rice who is a throwback to the idea that running a lot and shouting makes you a good player.In my opinion, he falls into the same bracket as Mount. That is, a good player who doesn't justify the hype that comes with him.
I wasn't comparing one against the other. I was saying that they're both over-rated. FWIW, though, I agree with you; Mount is better than Rice. That's not saying much, mind.Ok think mounts just above average but he’s damn site better than Rice who is a throwback to the idea that running a lot and shouting makes you a good player.
Sounds about right.We are in a small transitional period and aren't as effective as previous seasons, United are having their best season for ten years and are still behind City.
I think he’d do a decent job for us if we spent Phillips kind of money on him. When people talk about 100 million for him then it’s just stupid and he’s nowhere near that good.In my opinion, he falls into the same bracket as Mount. That is, a good player who doesn't justify the hype that comes with him.
Pilau isn’t badIs rice any good seems nothing special to me
Nice with Jerk Chicken..Is rice any good seems nothing special to me