Premier League Games 28/29 Feb/1st March

[Nascent Blues]

The only explanation is that he moved his feet away from ball.If he didn’t do that the ball would hit him so he was part of the play.

It's an interesting point, but I'm pretty sure that's not a law, as I don't think I've ever seen a player punished for moving out of the way.

 

[SWP's back]

Roy Keane and sourness chatting utter fucking shit

Bein Sports nailed it. Completely the wrong decision.

 

[SWP's back]

The only explanation is that he moved his feet away from ball.If he didn’t do that the ball would hit him so he was part of the play.

That’s some mental gymnastics you’re performing there pal.

 

[Nascent Blues]

Roy Keane and sourness chatting utter fucking shit

How the fuck can he be in his line of sight if he's lay down on the pitch and De Gea is fucking stood up? How fucking dense do you have to be not to understand that?

 

[creditunionhero]

The only explanation is that he moved his feet away from ball.If he didn’t do that the ball would hit him so he was part of the play.

So by moving away he didn't,t interfere. That is the correct thing to do. An attcker in an offside position moves away from a teammate moving on to the ball from an onside position.

 

[Bald fraud]

If that had of been the other way round would it have been disallowed ?

No

 

[bobmcfc]

How the fuck can he be in his line of sight if he's lay down on the pitch and De Gea is fucking stood up? How fucking dense do you have to be not to underdtand that?

Because the influence spreads to the pundits, told not to rile things up. They all fall in line because you cannot badmouth the premier league brand.

 

[Phil1]

The. Keeper. Was. Going. In a. Different. Direction.
That’s all they had to look at to see he wasn’t interfering.
An absolute disgraceful decision made by a professional referee. What fucking hope is there?

 

[Amadeus71]

But he did move, so he didn't interfere with play. Pretty simple really, if Sigurdsson isn't there, that plays out exactly the same, therefore he's not interfered

That’s what I’m saying,no reason for me to disallowed that goal.They will use that explanation to justify bullshit decision.

 

[Nightmare Walking]

To be fair here I think he was offside. He moved his legs. If he had not done that, the ball would have hit him and not gone in. He has purposely moved his legs out of the way so I think he is interfering.