Premier League Games 3/4 Sept '22

mat said:
Dyche for Bodger's?
Click to expand...

Very likely.

In my opinion, the owner gambled thinking why spend 100m+ when realistically they were never going to get that much higher in the league table, so he and the club took the cash this season and went to consolidate mid table.

You can never take for granted in this league, even as a solid mid table side, that the team is too good to go down even with a few player sales that have not played regularly.
 
It is the selective way VAR is applied in games that grates on People.

It comes across almost as if it is cheating.

The Poster saying "would you be happy Offside Goals being allowed to stand is totally missing the point".

Again i will go back to the Rags v Candle waivers game as my example.The winning Goal was clearly offside using the criteria applied today to cancel out that Brighton screamer.

One didn't need CGI lines to see the attacker was clearly ahead of the defender in the Rags game.It was visually obvious.

After the game it was said VAR was going to bring some common sense in to the VAR Booth.

If there was no clear daylihgt between a defender and an attacker then the Attacker gets the benefit.

The goal was allowed to stand that night, we didn't see any 4 minutes deliberation and CGI Lines which would have 100% proved he was offside.

Today we are back to 4 minutes forensically analyzing a cracking Goal.They couldn't even draw lines through the players.

You see my point ?
 
kaz7 said:
I like it , if cost wasnt a barrier i would have two sleeves done as well as my other ones
Click to expand...
Looks awful, in my opinion. Small tattoos, I have no issue with, though. If I was 10 years younger, I might even consider one. Maybe if we win the CL, I'll get a "warra CL" one!
 
SidJames said:
It is the selective way VAR is applied in games that grates on People.

It comes across almost as if it is cheating.

The Poster saying "would you be happy Offside Goals being allowed to stand is totally missing the point".

Again i will go back to the Rags v Candle waivers game as my example.The winning Goal was clearly offside using the criteria applied today to cancel out that Brighton screamer.

One didn't need CGI lines to see the attacker was clearly ahead of the defender in the Rags game.It was visually obvious.

After the game it was said VAR was going to bring some common sense in to the VAR Booth.

If there was no clear daylihgt between a defender and an attacker then the Attacker gets the benefit.

The goal was allowed to stand that night, we didn't see any 4 minutes deliberation and CGI Lines which would have 100% proved he was offside.

Today we are back to 4 minutes forensically analyzing a cracking Goal.They couldn't even draw lines through the players.

You see my point ?
Click to expand...

VAR are giving goals that are offside and chalking off goals that are good goals anyway.

There is no excuse for that considering they stop the bloody game and look at video from every angle, sometimes they look for ANYTHING to get a goal disallowed too.
 
spacecadet said:
Well Brenda is certainly in the long grass. He is to bullshit what Shakespeare was to literature. Few weeks in Spain on holiday, then bullshitting on Sky/BBC. Before bullshitting his way into another job.
Click to expand...
Probably signing his contract with Talkshite as we speak.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.