37 shots, 16 on target, so you were about right ;-)What were the stats for your game vs Red Star btw? Watching that match it seemed like you had a shot every couple of minutes!
Cheers. That could have been a cricket score!37 shots, 16 on target, so you were about right ;-)
It probably should have been by half time to be fair, but I said to my mate about 10 minutes before half time, that we'd end up conceding after missing so many chances (it was 22 in the first half - but our finishing was pretty poor, and their keeper good/lucky far too often).Cheers. That could have been a cricket score!
I don't bet, but I can see the appeal, after Rodri's sending off today, I imagine it went the other way, but I grew ever more confident in our defending, I love to see our defenders defend for their lives sometimes.I love it when City go a goal down at home when theres a lot of the game left to play, not because I'm an Arsenal fan but because it's easy money on betting exchanges to then back them for the win as the odds drift out to evens or so and 9 times out of 10 they'll come back to win.
Bumped with the Brighton game numbers.First page updated with todays poor showing all round.
That's exactly what set me off on this subject Jim, Sheff Utd A was probably worst, or Wolves A, what surprises me more, is that we have more shots away than at home, we have played one more game though, but the ratio is still higher.So; we have a conversion rate of 2 goals for every 13 shots. I wonder how that compares to the rest of the league. It feels low, in my opinion. We appear, at times, to be profligate when it comes to putting away chances. The game in Trafford, for example; we could have doubled the final tally. And I'm certain there's been other such games this season.