It doesn’t have to be. Any part of the ball overhanging any part of the line is fine.The ball not being placed in the quarter circle at corners.
It doesn’t have to be. Any part of the ball overhanging any part of the line is fine.The ball not being placed in the quarter circle at corners.
I appreciate that but I’m just Old School.It doesn’t have to be. Any part of the ball overhanging any part of the line is fine.
I'm with DM4M on this. If they were any good (remember, they are professional footballers, after all) at taking corners, surely they wouldn't need the ball to be overhanging the line. Not having a go (perish the thought) Norbiton. But I don't see what advantage it gives the taker.It doesn’t have to be. Any part of the ball overhanging any part of the line is fine.
But being in the quadrant was never in the laws AFAIK.I appreciate that but I’m just Old School.
Absolutely loved the hatred way back. Schoolyard City against Utd fights 70s and 80sI don't miss the hatred tbh kicking off etc
Innit,man innitAbsolutely loved the hatred way back. Schoolyard City against Utd fights 70s and 80s