It doesn’t have to be. Any part of the ball overhanging any part of the line is fine.The ball not being placed in the quarter circle at corners.
It doesn’t have to be. Any part of the ball overhanging any part of the line is fine.The ball not being placed in the quarter circle at corners.
I appreciate that but I’m just Old School.It doesn’t have to be. Any part of the ball overhanging any part of the line is fine.
I'm with DM4M on this. If they were any good (remember, they are professional footballers, after all) at taking corners, surely they wouldn't need the ball to be overhanging the line. Not having a go (perish the thought) Norbiton. But I don't see what advantage it gives the taker.It doesn’t have to be. Any part of the ball overhanging any part of the line is fine.
But being in the quadrant was never in the laws AFAIK.I appreciate that but I’m just Old School.
Absolutely loved the hatred way back. Schoolyard City against Utd fights 70s and 80sI don't miss the hatred tbh kicking off etc
Innit,man innitAbsolutely loved the hatred way back. Schoolyard City against Utd fights 70s and 80s
I could add so ,so much more to this but as I respect the Mods and don't want to get banned I'll keep stum.Hate dickheads who get a YouTube channel and think they’re experts
With knee jerk reactions after every single game.
Just for example. City play Everton and Foden doesn’t score or assist.
Arsenal play them the following week and Saka scores.
“OMG Saka is so levels above Foden man it’s scary”
That sort of shite