Aspirin does not thin the blood. It makes the chemical composition less likely to cause clots.
As someone who pushed back massively against my concerns against unrestricted free speech... do you still hold firm in your beliefs?
Presumably you draw the line at shouting fire in a crowded theater where no fire exits.
But what of outright false information? AI-generated.... or otherwise.
Is it your position that society is best served by allowing pretty much anything to be said - including AI-generated, completely false narratives?
===
I repeat my original position on this issue - absent facts - provable and obvious - sane governance is dead. And - at least in the USA - we have widespread, unopposed, free speech disinformation against vaccines, climate change, election integrity and so on.
And as a result we have Donald Trump as our president.
===
"Free speech" in the USA is, IMO, fucking out-of-control - permitting outright lies.
Are you OK with the status quo? Anything goes and individuals can sort truth from falsehood? Or - IMO - free speech is in need of a massive revamp in light of technologies which enable inaccurate beliefs to foster.
And in particular - as AI-generated misinformation becomes more and more persuasive - how are you, KS55, absent regulations - going to determine truth from falsehood - and if you're confident in your ability to do so... what about the common voter - who is unlikely to be as sophisticated at discerning truth from falsehood - absent guidance - as you?
