But surely if it weren't for child slavery, they'd have to charge more for joggy bottoms?amehh said:It's cheap, nasty, and children are being used as slaves to create their stock. Pathetic excuse for a shop.
brass neck said:why not good enough for ya?.....snob!!!!!!!!tmouseman said:Snobs.....
Don't like it don't go in.
I don't
brass neck said:Ill look down on anyone who is sub class, is dragging there kids up, swears in public for attention, wears tattoos and untasteful jewelry, and will think more about a drink of stella than a decent home cooked meal for there kids, its become unfashionable to look down at people but maybe if we got back to that way more people would be inclined to do something about there turgid little sub class lives, turn there life around and become respectable. maybe we wouldn't have so many teenage pregnancy's if we didnt have this slap dash attitude to girls getting up the stick, if it wasn't acceptable in society children wouldn't be allowed to run riot around the place, abusing people who try and stop them, abusing teachers, smoking, drinking and generally becoming replacements for the low life that unfortunately was allowed to breed and bring them into the world.
tmouseman said:I think you are blaming Primark for a little too much there mate....
one of those things that started off mildly amusing but rapidly became inane a bit like that "nice weather....for ducks" thing started off quite amusing ended up pathetic 10 years later!!!!!GStar said:Just to add to the list of why that place is hated:
People who shop there refer to it as "Primani".
brass neck said:tmouseman said:I think you are blaming Primark for a little too much there mate....
lol....good answer. dont get me wrong, we shopped cheep, we were poor, never became underclass though. Mind you, when I was a kid it was the working class that had fukc all but our parents worked (all though the devil woman tried her best to stop that) which made us respectful, now the working class do very well, everyone has warm houses, clothes on there back, phones, televisions, sky, holidays, cars. When i was little we had nothing, its the sub class that give the working class a bad name now, with there I dont care attitude and there horrid children.
Ronnie the Rep said:brass neck said:lol....good answer. dont get me wrong, we shopped cheep, we were poor, never became underclass though. Mind you, when I was a kid it was the working class that had fukc all but our parents worked (all though the devil woman tried her best to stop that) which made us respectful, now the working class do very well, everyone has warm houses, clothes on there back, phones, televisions, sky, holidays, cars. When i was little we had nothing, its the sub class that give the working class a bad name now, with there I dont care attitude and there horrid children.
it's sort of two different points you are making Brassy. I agree 100% about the low -living scum class but it wasn't Maggie that started this it was Blair and Brown with their benefits culture. as far as Primark is concerned, they actually share some suppliers with M&S and although I am sure they exploit some workers (how many employers don't!) they are ok quality and very good value for money