Proffesor Brian Cox

He certainly has something about him that manages to explain such complex stuff that even dullards such as me can understand and holds an audience captive with it.

Such a shame about his brother Issac being a gay pornstar though.
 
Hamann Pineapple said:
He's a bit too nice for my liking

How can you be tooooo nice?
I like him,he makes me listen to things I never understood and when he's finished...........................................I still don't. But he's made me feel nice.
 
I love the world of quantum physics and I'm not even that brilliant at understanding quantum physics, although as Richard Feynman reminded us:

If you think you know quantum theory, you don't know quantum theory

However, if you think what you've seen so far is 'mind blowing', this is nothing. The world of quantum theory really is mind-blowing.
 
Did Brian Cox just confuse quantum entanglement with the Pauli exclusion principle? I just looked this up and have found other people raising objections to this explanation:
<a class="postlink" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2012/02/23/everything-is-connected/#.UQ7n7Thp5mk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmi ... Q7n7Thp5mk</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/11081" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/11081</a>
 
Skashion said:
Did Brian Cox just confuse quantum entanglement with the Pauli exclusion principle? I just looked this up and have found other people raising objections to this explanation:
<a class="postlink" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2012/02/23/everything-is-connected/#.UQ7n7Thp5mk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmi ... Q7n7Thp5mk</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/11081" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/11081</a>


I know little about this stuff skash but i expect as in felds there are people who see it different

But i have enjoyed that
 
Rascal said:
Skashion said:
Did Brian Cox just confuse quantum entanglement with the Pauli exclusion principle? I just looked this up and have found other people raising objections to this explanation:
<a class="postlink" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2012/02/23/everything-is-connected/#.UQ7n7Thp5mk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmi ... Q7n7Thp5mk</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/11081" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/11081</a>


I know little about this stuff skash but i expect as in felds there are people who see it different

But i have enjoyed that
Rasc I'm going to look like an arse, but that's never been a problem for me. What program are we talking about?
 
Skashion said:
Did Brian Cox just confuse quantum entanglement with the Pauli exclusion principle? I just looked this up and have found other people raising objections to this explanation:
<a class="postlink" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2012/02/23/everything-is-connected/#.UQ7n7Thp5mk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmi ... Q7n7Thp5mk</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/11081" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/11081</a>
Not a fucking scooby doo sir. Sat and watched it tonight and to be frank, he could have been explaining the quantum theory of the existence of the Easter Bunny and I'd have accepted it.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.