I think what we need here is some sense of perspective. We are, without a doubt, one of the best run clubs - if not THE best - in world football. We have owners who have brought us a level of success, over the past 15 years, that even the most optimistic of supporters could not have dreamed of. We have a superb manager and a team which plays the sort of football, which is an absolute joy to watch.
So for City fans to launch a general protest against the club, and the way in which it is run, seems to me to be the epitome of the words "spoiled" and "entitled". Isn't this exactly the reason why us City fans have derided fans of other big clubs - especially Liverpool - for so long; because their fans believe they deserve success, more than any other club? Have a thought for the likes of Reading fans, whose club has been decimated by an unscrupulous overseas owner, who is out to bleed as much cash from their club as he can. They are the sort of fans who have every right to throw tennis balls on the pitch or launch a pitch invasion in protest against their owner.
If City fans were to launch a protest against our owners it would, in my opinion, lead to nothing more than loud guffaws from the rest of the football world and accusations over "entitlement". I think we have enough undeserved negative media coverage to contend with, without providing another one ourselves.
Of course, the club is not perfect - far from it in many regards - and I wouldn't seek to deny anyone with a genuine grievance against the club to seek redress. But a general protest? Absolutely not, in my view.
Let's consider the wider picture and have a thought for the supporters of Reading, Bury and countless other clubs which have been pillaged by rapacious owners. Surely, our grievances are nowhere near as serious as theirs.
