PSG Owners may scale back investment due to Media criticism / (Allegedly for Sale After the World Cup - Pg 17))

Oh ! It was just a good old rant.
Well, apparently Platini was in talk with City owners at the time of the 2014 sanction. Guess he tainted your club too. Coincidence that you are under investigation after he left UEFA ? Don't think so.
We’ve always been under investigation, from the day abromovich decided to agree to ffp.

Was he applying to be our treasurer?
 
Well aren't you a thoroughly pleasant chap!

Seriously though my point was (ish) would you trade mid prem mediocrity for going balls deep in having a go for it like they did. I would.

Of course it's academic for yourselves but you were one of us once remember
I am. As "Tim nice but dim" would say; I'm a bloody good bloke, actually.
 
We’ve always been under investigation, from the day abromovich decided to agree to ffp.

Was he applying to be our treasurer?
I don't care about the truth like you. PSG has always been under investigation too. Even more so than City.
So, like you, i think Platini is bent and tainted City and what we are seeing is surrrrreeeeeely not a coincidence.
Without daddy Platini, no more fun for City.
 
I don't care about the truth like you. PSG has always been under investigation too. Even more so than City.
So, like you, i think Platini is bent and tainted City and what we are seeing is surrrrreeeeeely not a coincidence.
Without daddy Platini, no more fun for City.
Do you not thinks it's correct you were under investigation ? Any team away from the premier league (or indeed in it) could not justify spunking £200 mill on one player and claiming its within their trading means. It's ridiculous. What income (genuine not donated) do PSG make to make such a purchase viable under ffp? At least MANCHESTER City (hate people saying city, disrespectful to other city's out there) can claim they earn from Sky.
 
Do you not thinks it's correct you were under investigation ? Any team away from the premier league (or indeed in it) could not justify spunking £200 mill on one player and claiming its within their trading means. It's ridiculous. What income (genuine not donated) do PSG make to make such a purchase viable under ffp? At least MANCHESTER City (hate people saying city, disrespectful to other city's out there) can claim they earn from Sky.
PSG can since they were cleared of any wrongdoing.
You for get about something. PSG did spend the world record transfer fee but sold a lot of players.

I have already said this here and SWP too but City does spend way more than PSG despite not engaging in those high profile transfers because they sell less and tend to spread their expenses equally between their acquisitions.
SWP and i already pointed out that QTA is worth 50 M for UEFA FFP, does it seem outrightly high for you ?

And ofc, neither City or PSG could have sustained their level of spending without their owners. But i don't see anything wrong with that.
 
Do you not thinks it's correct you were under investigation ? Any team away from the premier league (or indeed in it) could not justify spunking £200 mill on one player and claiming its within their trading means. It's ridiculous. What income (genuine not donated) do PSG make to make such a purchase viable under ffp? At least MANCHESTER City (hate people saying city, disrespectful to other city's out there) can claim they earn from Sky.

Nearly every club has spent above its "trading income/ means" at some point. It's very hard to name a club that hasn't.
 
I don't care about the truth like you. PSG has always been under investigation too. Even more so than City.
So, like you, i think Platini is bent and tainted City and what we are seeing is surrrrreeeeeely not a coincidence.
Without daddy Platini, no more fun for City.
City tried working with uefa, so I guess that what you mean by “ in talks with him”.

The cartel have rounded on you, without a doubt, but more so now platini has gone. Coincidence?

I don’t want to piss on your chips, but platini has nothing to do with us.
 
PSG can since they were cleared of any wrongdoing.
You for get about something. PSG did spend the world record transfer fee but sold a lot of players.

I have already said this here and SWP too but City does spend way more than PSG despite not engaging in those high profile transfers because they sell less and tend to spread their expenses equally between their acquisitions.
SWP and i already pointed out that QTA is worth 50 M for UEFA FFP, does it seem outrightly high for you ?

And ofc, neither City or PSG could have sustained their level of spending without their owners. But i don't see anything wrong with that.
There really is no point in ffp then is there. Whether PSG were 'cleared' or not that means nothing. Football is f@cking bent. I'm really on the verge. When shit****s like Bruce Buck call anyone outside the top six as the great unwashed you know it's f@cked.

How about you pick up your ball and f@ck off to your super league. It'll all end in tears and you'll be begging to come back.

I'm not aiming that at MCFC btw min think they know which side their breads buttered on.
 
There really is no point in ffp then is there. Whether PSG were 'cleared' or not that means nothing. Football is f@cking bent. I'm really on the verge. When shit****s like Bruce Buck call anyone outside the top six as the great unwashed you know it's f@cked.

How about you pick up your ball and f@ck off to your super league. It'll all end in tears and you'll be begging to come back.

I'm not aiming that at MCFC btw min think they know which side their breads buttered on.
I don’t blame you for being on the verge. It is bent and I don’t see it changing anytime soon.
Even now, in the good times, that makes me sadder than a salah swallow dive.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.