aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
They can lose by 1 if they want.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PSG set to fail FFP again?
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
What untruthful reporting?I stand corrected, just read Swiss Ramble and other articles talking about the controversial Etihad deal.
Does it mean that, with Football Leaks allegation, they could also try to tie those contracts as related parties on top of the untruthfull reporting ?
Not that i think they will succeed but do you think they could try that angle to try and shackle City ?
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,594
To be fair, half of Bayern’s board have done time for fraud and/or tax evasion but no one seems to call them out about it when they criticise City over how we handle and spend money. Funny that. I personally hope the ****s just die.I have a dream. Somewhere a hacker, a blue, is working away to get hold of Bayern's darkest secrets. Klinsmann exposed as a sexual predator, their commercial share holders trickling money in, Hoeness is a nazi.... etc etc What a coup that would be.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,594
That Mansour paid the Etihad bill to City and no Etihad as reported in der Spaniel.What untruthful reporting?
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
As long as it's not quick and painless.To be fair, half of Bayern’s board have done time for fraud and/or tax evasion but no one seems to call them out about it when they criticise City over how we handle and spend money. Funny that. I personally hope the ****s just die.
Gabriel
Well-Known Member
They can lose by 1 if they want.
You're of a more benign disposition than me. ;-)
Who has reported something untruthfully?That Mansour paid the Etihad bill to City and no Etihad as reported in der Spaniel.
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
I'm really unconcerned by that game tbh, rags don't have a farts chance in a hurricane of winning it outright and would be a far easier quarter final opponent than PSG.You're of a more benign disposition than me. ;-)
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,594
Who has reported something untruthfully?
Again, according to the German paper’s stolen internal emails, one or both of City/Etihad.
This has been covered extensively in the Der Spiegel football leaks thread so I’m not breaking new ground.
Gabriel
Well-Known Member
I'm really unconcerned by that game tbh, rags don't have a farts chance in a hurricane of winning it outright and would be a far easier quarter final opponent than PSG.
True. Simply want to see their sails collapsed again.
SilvaisSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 1,881
My view on this will never change.
If the owner of a business wants to spend lots of his money that’s his call.
If another business wants to sponsor his business or one of his players, also their call.
This was never, ever, ever an issue until us and PSG came along with ‘new money’.
It’s beyond bent. I sincerely hope PSG tell them to fuck off and say see you in court you set of ****s.
Isn’t it ridiculous that we have to be ‘clever’ and they could tie themselves in knots over all this bollocks?
Just let football clubs get on with being football clubs ffs.
Also,what about the clubs who gladly accept these big sums being paid to them in transfer fees?
Barca re Neymar.
Liverpool re Coutinho.
Juve re Pogba.
Etc etc etc.
Aren’t they just as complicit in the ‘inflation of the market’ and clubs like PSG being ‘investigated’?
It’s ok to ‘receive’ big fees but not to ‘pay’ big fees?
The nonsense levels are that high that the whole concept actually starts to laugh at itself.
Top posts fella...
The whole set up of FFP is a piss take, the same clubs with massive debt still have massive debt.
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
Oh, always. But it's most satisfying when we do it and unlike the FA Cup, there's no danger of them fluking this comp.True. Simply want to see their sails collapsed again.
Tax evasion by Bayern officers and players and those of Spain's big two is old hat and a given. We need new scandal.To be fair, half of Bayern’s board have done time for fraud and/or tax evasion but no one seems to call them out about it when they criticise City over how we handle and spend money. Funny that. I personally hope the ****s just die.
Sex is always a good bet.
#find a blue hacker
Edit Ronaldo is currently under investigation for rape, I believe.
Last edited:
And even to stay purely football related, you have never heard the selling clubs saying bad words about City or PSG. Those clubs pay well, in time and don't play dirty tricks. Real and Barça have a long list of players faking injuries or going awol to force the move. Somehow, this is not shameful and not ruining the game. No !!! What is ruining the game are clubs being well compensated for their player value.Tax evasion by Bayern officers and players and those of Spain's big two is old hat and a given. We need new scandal.
Sex is always a good bet.
And i'm not even starting to talk about their newspapers that are in fact propaganda outlets.
None of the emails showed that we'd reported anything that was untrue.Again, according to the German paper’s stolen internal emails, one or both of City/Etihad.
This has been covered extensively in the Der Spiegel football leaks thread so I’m not breaking new ground.
They put it out there and, led people to that conclusion, but I'm pretty sure none of the leaks had anything to do with what we reported or didn't.
M
M
mat
Guest
IF - We both qualify for the next round of the CL and are drawn against each other. Should we as fans both unite in shaming UEFA over both legs?
Joint chant, banners etc.
I'd love that be part of that.
Joint chant, banners etc.
I'd love that be part of that.
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 30,176
Two very good reasons ;-)I think a lot of us admire what we see as PSG’s ‘stick two fingers up to UEFA’ approach. And of course you’re one of our favourite clubs just at the moment for one very good reason....
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 30,176
Errr "His Highness" is not Sheikh Mansour it is the Emir. The Emir is referred to as "His Highness" Sheikh Mansour would be referred to as "His Highness Sheikh Mansour". There is no way on Planet Earth that Simon Pearce would have made such a mistake in UAE social etiquette - even in an email to a collegue working abroad.That Mansour paid the Etihad bill to City and no Etihad as reported in der Spaniel.
Last edited:
Let’s meet in the final that would really piss the tossers at UEFA offIF - We both qualify for the next round of the CL and are drawn against each other. Should we as fans both unite in shaming UEFA over both legs?
Joint chant, banners etc.
I'd love that be part of that.
Just realised this will never happen as UEFA will do everything they can too make sure they don’t meet in a final
Last edited:
M
M
mat
Guest
60,000 booing the anthem in front of TV Audience of billions would do it.Let’s meet in the final that would really piss the tossers at UEFA off