Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 30,618
Pure coincidence.They've also signed Silva and Kompany to boot deals.
Pure coincidence.They've also signed Silva and Kompany to boot deals.
United changed several times during their successful period and the others can't change because they're tied into huge long-term deals.All the big clubs care who sponsors their clothing, I doubt that Real Madrid, Barcelona, United, Bayern, will change their prestigious brand of sportswear to a less important when they are at the best moment in their history.
I'm not sure that really comes into it. I remember similar arguments when we signed with Nike, because we were the only PL team signed to them at the time. But it's not really their job to raise our visibility. If anything, it's the other way around.As I said in a previous post, perhaps it's that City don't believe that Nike or Adidas would put their efforts into raising our visibility, where as with Puma, we are their number one sports team so they will
As I said, we are now receiving market value for a club of our sustained success and profile
And we do need the extra €30m a year. Have you seen how much a really fucking average midfielder costs from Juventus?
I'm not sure that really comes into it. I remember similar arguments when we signed with Nike, because we were the only PL team signed to them at the time. But it's not really their job to raise our visibility. If anything, it's the other way around.
Wow. If the rags miss out on Europe this season, or even if they get EL, we could quite conceivably catch them financially in 2020. In fact if they miss out on Europe completely then we could well overtake them.Staff at the club are on strict orders to keep quiet but it is Puma, 100 percent.
£300m over five years.
30 million for City is the return they give in the super market when you go to buy beer. Actually I do not understand our policies of the people who manage our sales income, give our players at the price of eggs (Dzeko, Kolarov, Sancho, Tevez, Nasri, etc, etc, etc ...) and they are bothered not to receive 30 millions of one the best sports brands, they really are very wrong.
They all go with the money
Real Madrid is the jewel in Adidas' crown as is Barcelona to Nike
Adidas are shareholders in Bayern Munich
I'm not sure that really comes into it. I remember similar arguments when we signed with Nike, because we were the only PL team signed to them at the time. But it's not really their job to raise our visibility. If anything, it's the other way around.