Puncheon trip on Zaba goes unpunished...

[Prestwich_Blue]

But he didn't get a yellow, we didn't even get a free kick. How can that be the correct outcome?

I think he means the FA can only issue a retrospective ban if it's deemed that the offence would have been a red card.

 

[aguero93:20]

I think he means the FA can only issue a retrospective ban if it's deemed that the offence would have been a red card.

Difficult to see how it's not, he's deliberately struck a player off the ball, it ceases to be only a trip when off the ball imo.

 

[CrownPointBlue]

It would be interesting to know who the members of the review panel were and how,under the new law,they arrived at their conclusion.

Inconsistent incompetence !!

The Sheik's revenge will ultimately know no bounds.

 

[aguero93:20]

It would be interesting to know who the members of the review panel were and how,under the new law,they arrived at their conclusion.

Inconsistent incompetence !!

The Sheik's revenge will ultimately know no bounds.

Gill, Mills and Riley.

 

[stony]

How is that foul supposed to have been spotted?

By the lino who would have been right next to it.

 

[stan bowles]

Definite retrospective red and a ban. Cynical, deliberate and dangerous....but as it's not City then of course not ;)

 

[willipp]

Is that really a red? He legged him up, that's all. Yellow at best surely.

 

[jimharri]

Hopefully he'll get a nice warm Mancunian welcome when they come up to play us.

 

[117 M34]

Let's be honest, if one of ours got a red during the match for that we would all be raging.
It was a trip and he should have been booked but never a red

 

[aguero93:20]

Hopefully he'll get a nice warm Mancunian welcome when they come up to play us.