Re: City lose out to the rags on TV
Think you missed my point tbf. The number of neutrals far outweighs the number of United fans in this country, and they'd prefer to watch City imo. Far more interesting than yet another United group game.
citykev28 said:hgblue said:bobby chariots said:Interesting choice made by ITV, although not a surprise. The global audience for united is enormous compared to City's and clearly money is the driving force here.
However, I wonder if the 'impartial' audience is bigger.....and might like to see if MegaBucks City can live up to the hype.
We had better play some sexy football in the next season or two if we really are going to knock them off their (revenue saturated) perch.
This is the crux of the matter. Would the neutral prefer to watch another in a long line of United Champions League games or City's first ever game in the competition? My money would be on the latter so if both games were broadcast 'head to head' I bet the majority would watch City.
i don't think so. there is an incredible amount of plastic united fans around the country. i've lived in hull for 12 years and it amazing how many there are. this is probably the same nationwide. for tv figures nationwide, they'd piss it because most blues would be at eastlands while united are away and have millions of 'fans'.
Think you missed my point tbf. The number of neutrals far outweighs the number of United fans in this country, and they'd prefer to watch City imo. Far more interesting than yet another United group game.