You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Raheem Sterling - 2017/18 performances
- Thread starter rapidCT
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Don Karleone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 20,832
- Team supported
- Vampire Squid FC
Wasn't great, still managed to set up our best chance in the first half.
NorthamptonBlue
Well-Known Member
His worst performance of the tournament.
By my calculations England scored 1 goal in the tournament when Sterling wasn't on the pitch.
Sterling off for Rashford are the words of idiots.
Another weird way to justify a poor tournament. Want to stick to real stats like he only contributed to one goal all tournament. Against Panama
Another weird way to justify a poor tournament. Want to stick to real stats like he only contributed to one goal all tournament. Against Panama
He wasn't poor though Tom was he? He wasn't great by any means either but let's have it right here, he was average, no better or worse than the bulk of the team.
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 11,945
Should retire from international football. Why should he bother, he could have got England to the final today by scoring 10 goals and he wouldn't get any credit.
He wasn't poor though Tom was he? He wasn't great by any means either but let's have it right here, he was average, no better or worse than the bulk of the team.
Deluded as ever. He was poor, there’s not much difference between poor and average too. This isn’t about anyone else this is the Sterling thread. If there was a Dele Alli thread I’d happily post about him being our worst player. My reply was to more backwards logic to try and justify his performances. Just because others were poor to doesn’t mean you have to bury your head in the sand with Sterlings showings. Oh he runs though doesn’t he, Christ.
Let’s put it this way, he plays like that for us then he will be dropped for Mahrez quicker than bluemoon posters move the goalposts to suit their agendas.
Should retire from international football. Why should he bother, he could have got England to the final today by scoring 10 goals and he wouldn't get any credit.
Could be true, missing every chance falling to him doesn’t deserve credit though does it
Deluded as ever. He was poor, there’s not much difference between poor and average too. This isn’t about anyone else this is the Sterling thread. If there was a Dele Alli thread I’d happily post about him being our worst player. My reply was to more backwards logic to try and justify his performances. Just because others were poor to doesn’t mean you have to bury your head in the sand with Sterlings showings. Oh he runs though doesn’t he, Christ.
Let’s put it this way, he plays like that for us then he will be dropped for Mahrez quicker than bluemoon posters move the goalposts to suit their agendas.
Agenda? What the fuck are you talking about? Why would I have an agenda?
How many were poor then Tom? Made it to the semi final of a World Cup despite more than one of your regulars being poor, Southgate must be a fucking genius then.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.