Raheem Sterling - Done - See main forum

[Sheikhspeare]

So,rather than 45m....they'd rather him not play/unsettle the dressing room and leave on a free in 12 months?

Its becoming petty and personal for them

 

[Gundogan's Moustache]

Mirror - Liverpool’s owners FSG are prepared to let Raheem Sterling rot in the reserves rather than let him go for less than £50m.

But it's City ruining football isn't it ?

Letting one of England's biggest hopes rot In the reserves in a European Championship year for the sake of 5Million pound

 

[@BluePhil8]

Yeah, it leaves us in a bit of a quandary. Do we stump up the full £50m and avoid missing out on the player, but look weak from a negotiating point of view?

Or do we gamble and hope they blink first before the window closes?

Decisions, decisions...

I don't mean to sound hyperbolic but it would be catastrophic for us to lose out on Sterling.

 

[Dave S]

Let them sweat then.

This.

 

[5948947]

Walk away City they will regret it big time

 

[citytill1die84]

LMFAO

 

[moomba]

I don't mean to sound hyperbolic but it would be catastrophic for us to lose out on Sterling.

No it wouldn't.

 

[Yates]

But it's City ruining football isn't it ?

Letting one of England's biggest hopes rot In the reserves in a European Championship year for the sake of 5Million pound

Can't imagine that'd go down well with the media, but then again it is the istorious Liverpool, all Sterlings fault, never should pull on an England shirt again.

 

[Wolfkin]

Should Sterling refuse to go on the tour, LFC will immediately open negotiations with the PFA - over the appropriate punishment. (Mirror)

 

[Yomi]

City should walk away and get an homegrown defender to fill the space and spend below that price to get Marco Reus.