ninjamonkey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 18,556
Im not spinning anything. £49million you paid for him. What football fan in the country thinks hes worth £49million? Ask any football fan from other teams if they think hes worth that.
And at the end of the day from the 2 clubs involved, we dont think hes worth £49million, and neither do you guys! Let be absolutely honest.
Neither your fans or our fans think hes worth that.
Of course he's not worth that amount. the market is going crazy right now and has been every since you lot paid £35 million for Andy Carroll. The fact is in this current climate If you want the best players around you have to up the bar everytime. United were doing it last year, we've started it this year. If it carries on, £50 million for Sterling in 1/2 years is going to seem like nothing. what you fail to realise is whether we pay £20/30/50 or 100 million for him, it's ultimately irrelevant. What matters is from City's point of view, we've just brought to the club Liverpools best player and the best young player in Europe who will help us significantly to challenge and win trophies. The money you;ve received will just about get you Benteke along with a reminder to the world that Liverpool are no longer a big club and any talent looking at going there will think twice in the future.
If Aguero was sold for twice the world record fee I'd still be fucking gutted. I'd probably feel that the money for the club was good, maybe even fair value, but a player I idolise would have departed and so I wouldn't be thinking about the cash; I'd be thinking that a truly great player had left. If we would have had a player come up from the EDS at 17, be it Barker, Kelechi etc. and they had the impact for us that Sterling had for the dippers, I'd be fucking gutted if they then left left for £50 million after two seasons, just like I was gutted when SWP went to Chelsea for £22.
They can feign some sort of victory from the fee all they like, but what matters is the 90 minutes on the pitch, and they have definitely shat out in that regards.
Well put. Their mentality is that of a small time club that are delighted with the money as it means survival. When we sold SWP. i was utterly devastated but i could just about stomach it eventually as we needed it desperately to survive. If we were a better team in a better position and had lost him i wouldn't of cared how much we got for him, i would of been dejected from the realisation we aren't in a position to hang on to our best players improve and challenge for honours. It shows a complete lack of ambition on Liverpools part to lose their best player for the past 2 seasons. For a truly big club, the money isn't a concern because they are competing and winning trophies.
Last edited: