ColinLee said:
.A. said:
Navas is a winger and that 3 year period allegedly saw his peak. If people deem Navas and his meagre output good enough for us, then I hope they're enjoying our relative mediocrity; it's what they deserve.
Sterling is without question a supremely talented kid who would offer us another dimension immediately whilst also having world-class potential. We have to acknowledge that we aren't even the most attractive prospect in English football, let alone Europe, so we are going to have to buy potential and forge our own stars.
I might point out that I'd have Sterling in a heartbeat, I let the club worry about the price since it's not my money.
But you can sod off with the "we aren't even the most attractive prospect in English football" ;)
It's true though; we were on the way to becoming the best until the Spaniards and Pellegrini came to power and completely sabotaged our momentum with their incompetence.
Why are we buying football clubs around the world when we can't even string successive league titles together? If that's such a wonderful idea, why haven't Bayern done it? Or Barcelona? Or Real Madrid?
Let's be honest, if you're a neutral player, would you join us instead of any of the three clubs currently ahead of us in the league? The prospect of working with Van Gaal and Mourinho is far more enticing than Pellegrini, whereas Wenger, aided by geography, has been able to pull some better players to Arsenal than we've brought in while the amigos have been here.
We are a team that has regularly featured the likes of Navas, Fernando, Garcia, Kolarov and Mangala in the past two seasons, yet our fans think we can turn our noses up at the likes of Sterling?!
The work of Cook and Marwood made us a top club, both in a commercial and sporting sense; their successors are taking us backwards.