'RAW' means 'SHIT'

[shaundickov]

I hate the way some people defend the likes of Caicedo, Etuhu and Evans by saying that they are 'raw'.

What they really mean is that they are not good enough to be in the team.

Please drop the whole 'raw' argument. It's tiring.

 

[Dancini]

You're an absolute prick, how will players improve if they don't play. Of course a 30 year old who has been playing twice as long will look better than a 19 year old.

 

[ElanJo]

You're an absolute prick, how will players improve if they don't play. Of course a 30 year old who has been playing twice as long will look better than a 19 year old.

Agreed

Caicedo has something about him, and if the so-called fans don't 'Edghill him' then he could develop into a useful player.

 

[chrisi]

edit

 

[Bluemoon115]

OK, we'll drop that if you promise to let us drop you on your head a few times, to try and knock some sense into you.

 

[shaundickov]

You're an absolute prick, how will players improve if they don't play. Of course a 30 year old who has been playing twice as long will look better than a 19 year old.

Loan them out then until they are worthy to wear the shirt of the richest club in the world.

 

[Ntini77]

I described Caicedo as 'raw' as I don't think he's the finished article yet but certainly has very good potential.

I'm not going to say he's shit, because I honestly don't think he is.

 

[BlueSinclair]

*sigh*

Even though a few players are not good enough to play we DONT HAVE ANYONE ELSE? And they are young and will be inconsistent, and they have showed that THEY ARE PROMISING, just because a lone striker falls through against chelseas defence does not mean hes shit or anything like it. Evans was just as bad, and who else would you play? Vassell? Yes I would but everyone else in here hates him.

 

[Bill]

to be fair non of them are good enough atm for a first team start.

 

[Spindash]

Don't be too hard on shaundickov, he's a raw poster.