MCC
Well-Known Member
I think even most scousers think RAWK is a joke. Full of non going, asian, scandinavian, southern shandy drinking plonkers who live in the 80`s.
Prestwich_Blue said:Various really.Quaristice said:Some extremely positive reviews about Aguero here
What's the issue?
1) The "Yes he looked good but how will he cope on a wet winter Monday night in Stoke" brigade.
2) The "Yes he looked good; what's he doing at a shitty little no-mark club with no history" brigade
3) The "Carroll/Suarez are much better" brigade.
4) The "He's only playing for them because we won't pay daft wages" brigade (ignoring the fact their wage bill in the last accounts was only £10m less than ours).
5) The "He should be playing for us because he's a lifelong Liverpool fan" brigade
6) The "Carroll's a better buy because over 5 years he'll cost us a lot less because we're paying him less" brigade.
Etc.
Apart from them (about 90% of RAWK) they're being very fair.
southern muppet said:It seems like a lifetime ago that stuff like this actually used to wind me up. I've long since gone past even apathy and into relishing it now, the taste of other fan's tears is addictive. I'd rather be hated than disingenuously back-slapped and faux-respected merely for providing no real threat. We're the pantomime villains and I wouldn't have it any other way.
bringer678 said:They were on about us copying the Poznan! :s that never walk alone song was a great idea by them.... NOT! And how about the other song they got from Celtic, 'I just can't get enough!' and they have another song they copied from scummy Celtic but I don't know the name
Prestwich_Blue said:I read them all. Yes they were impressed with the goal but there were a lot on there who came out with some variation of one of the above. and there was a general air of (2); that somehow we weren't entitled to a player like that but they (despite having won nothing for 6 years) were.Quaristice said:Prestwich_Blue said:Various really.
1) The "Yes he looked good but how will he cope on a wet winter Monday night in Stoke" brigade.
2) The "Yes he looked good; what's he doing at a shitty little no-mark club with no history" brigade
3) The "Carroll/Suarez are much better" brigade.
4) The "He's only playing for them because we won't pay daft wages" brigade (ignoring the fact their wage bill in the last accounts was only £10m less than ours).
5) The "He should be playing for us because he's a lifelong Liverpool fan" brigade
6) The "Carroll's a better buy because over 5 years he'll cost us a lot less because we're paying him less" brigade.
Etc.
Apart from them (about 90% of RAWK) they're being very fair.
I guess you missed the posts after his 2nd goal.
stony said:Prestwich_Blue said:And this from the club that went backwards under Benitez.Vienna_70 said:Numpty!
One of their favourite sayings is "If City went for Rafa" They honestly think Mancini is a poor manager with no pedigree and Rafa is the greatest manager ever to grace football.
Unknown_Genius said:stony said:Prestwich_Blue said:And this from the club that went backwards under Benitez.
One of their favourite sayings is "If City went for Rafa" They honestly think Mancini is a poor manager with no pedigree and Rafa is the greatest manager ever to grace football.
Benitez's record in Europe is much better than Mancini's.