Red Issue shameful front cover

TheMightyQuinn said:
The 'grief junkies' brilliantly compare September 11th to Munich.

scaled.php

I feel quite sickly now.
 
How long before they exhume the lot of them and charge people a tenner to see the remains. They must be running out of ideas on how to rape and pillage the disaster to make more money.
 
LoveCity said:
How long before they exhume the lot of them and charge people a tenner to see the remains. They must be running out of ideas on how to rape and pillage the disaster to make more money.

Bar the disgraceful AIG stunt can you point me towards other money making schemes?
 
Matty said:
camelcoat said:
SWP's back said:
It was, you are right.

You don't think you have a monopoly on it, you're simply the only club to merchandise and market it.

What a prick

I have no time whatsoever for Liverpool. I find most things about their club to be distasteful, moronic and entitled. However the way they handled Hillsborough, both at the time and over the proceeding years, has been pretty much impecable. I'm not talking about the events on that day and Liverpools role in them, I'm talking about the aftermath. Liverpool handled themselves with dignity, and respected those who died in a sympathetic manner. They are still fighting for the truth to come out, but apart from that, and the anniversary of the actual event, they keep themselves to themselves over the incident, a truly remarkable feat when you consider their propensity to grasp for anything to grieve over.

The you have the Munich air disaster, an equally tragic event, albeit 30 years prior to Hillsborough and with a lower death toll. Now if United simply acknowledged the anniversary with reverance each year people would have no issues whatsoever with it. After all, it's only right to remember those who died at that time. It's the seemingly weekly references to it in the media, both from United and non-united affiliated individuals which rankles and, ultimately, isn't doing United any favours on the sympathy/empathy front. It's like "that balmy night in 99" but with a tragic twist, a tragic twist that should see the event treated with respect and not used as a bi-line for articles, or a segway between unrelated points.

Add to that the increase in Worldwide appeal which has an undeniable link to the events of 50+ years ago and people start to feel apathy rather than empathy. United's profile, like it or not, was increased by the tragedy. That wasn't anyone's fault, it was inevitable. However there are ways of dealing with that, as time passes the association, in none United fans minds, between United and a specific disaster, diminishes, or at least should. Fans born 10 or 20 years after the air disaster have no reason to make the connection to any great degree, yes it happened, but so long ago it doesn't really factor into their view of the club. That natural distance between people now and the events of over half a century ago simply hasn't been allowed to happen. Rather than going for the more sympathetic approach, the more respectful approach of actually allowing the dead to rest in peace, in the way Liverpool have, United over the years have made constant reference to Munich. No-one has been left in any doubt as to just how tragic it all was. Without wishing to sound overly callous, the Munich air disaster shouldn't really matter to my life, or the lives of anyone under the age of about 40, maybe more. It was so long ago, JFK was killed more recently! Man landed on the moon more recently. Hell, England won the World Cup more recently! The only reason it does matter is that the club won't let it lie. I can accept Bobby Charlton talking about, after all he lived through it, it actually happened to him, although it gets slightly galling when, unprovoked and unprompted, and entire unrelated to whatever he's talking about, he starts to reference it. In every interview he ever gives. I really can't stand Kenny Dalgliesh, he's a truly vile man, but he was at Hillsborough that day, he experienced the tragedy first hand, and far more recently. I can't remember, unless the actual topic of conversation was Hillsborough itself, him bring it up. In fact, he kept quiet about it for 20 years.

Basically, for many football fans, the constant referencing back to something that happened over 50 years ago and demanding attention, respect and compassion in relation to it wore thin a long time ago. The time gap between present day and the Munich air disaster is more than the time gap between the Munich air disaster and the Titanic sinking. Do you honestly think, in the 1950's, people thought about the Titanic at all, yet alone talked about it on a seemingly daily basis? And why would they? Disasters where people died or are killed occur each and every year. Do the respectful thing, keep it in-house. Remember and respect the dead, but don't make the mistake of thinking anyone else has to feel the same way, or wants to be involved. It's a United thing, from a long long time ago, it would be best to keep it that way.


That's a good post mate, I would disagree with one thing though, at the time and for many years after, it wasn't a 'united thing', it was a 'Manchester thing', everybody felt it and it's the reason most of the older generation of my family changed from City to united, it only became a 'united thing' once they decided to make the most of it.

OH and I find it quite offensive when some c*nt from Kent thinks he can tell me as a born and bred Mancunian he has more right to speak about it than him because he supports united.
 
babesMEN_468X310.jpg


Revealed: How Manchester United tried to cash in on Munich tribute

Read more: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-512327/Revealed-How-Manchester-United-tried-cash-Munich-tribute.html#ixzz1qQDdiWmS" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/articl ... z1qQDdiWmS</a>

Manchester United were last night embroiled in an unseemly row over the Munich memorial service after trying to charge £5,000 for television footage of the event.

BBC top brass in London were furious after being told they would have to pay for pictures from a service commemorating the plane crash 50 years ago, which killed eight of the Busby Babes and three club officials.

Only MUTV, the club's own TV station, will be allowed to have cameras at the event, being held tomorrow in an Old Trafford suite.

United were told in fierce correspondence that such a fee 'ran against every convention' governing TV news access for high-profile events as well as giving the 'scandalous' impression that the club were looking to benefit from Munich 50 years on.

Feelings in Manchester are running high about any commercial aspect to the anniversary. A giant Munich mural at Old Trafford was paint bombed because it contained the logo of United kit sponsors AIG.

Old Trafford officials told the BBC they were only demanding a fee in retaliation for the corporation's behaviour in January 2006, when they sent MUTV a bill for £4,765, plus VAT, for their share of the TV rights to George Best's funeral. The fee was later reduced to £3,500.
 
Matty said:
I have no time whatsoever for Liverpool. I find most things about their club to be distasteful, moronic and entitled. However the way they handled Hillsborough, both at the time and over the proceeding years, has been pretty much impecable. I'm not talking about the events on that day and Liverpools role in them, I'm talking about the aftermath. Liverpool handled themselves with dignity, and respected those who died in a sympathetic manner. They are still fighting for the truth to come out, but apart from that, and the anniversary of the actual event, they keep themselves to themselves over the incident, a truly remarkable feat when you consider their propensity to grasp for anything to grieve over.

The you have the Munich air disaster, an equally tragic event, albeit 30 years prior to Hillsborough and with a lower death toll. Now if United simply acknowledged the anniversary with reverance each year people would have no issues whatsoever with it. After all, it's only right to remember those who died at that time. It's the seemingly weekly references to it in the media, both from United and non-united affiliated individuals which rankles and, ultimately, isn't doing United any favours on the sympathy/empathy front. It's like "that balmy night in 99" but with a tragic twist, a tragic twist that should see the event treated with respect and not used as a bi-line for articles, or a segway between unrelated points.

Add to that the increase in Worldwide appeal which has an undeniable link to the events of 50+ years ago and people start to feel apathy rather than empathy. United's profile, like it or not, was increased by the tragedy. That wasn't anyone's fault, it was inevitable. However there are ways of dealing with that, as time passes the association, in none United fans minds, between United and a specific disaster, diminishes, or at least should. Fans born 10 or 20 years after the air disaster have no reason to make the connection to any great degree, yes it happened, but so long ago it doesn't really factor into their view of the club. That natural distance between people now and the events of over half a century ago simply hasn't been allowed to happen. Rather than going for the more sympathetic approach, the more respectful approach of actually allowing the dead to rest in peace, in the way Liverpool have, United over the years have made constant reference to Munich. No-one has been left in any doubt as to just how tragic it all was. Without wishing to sound overly callous, the Munich air disaster shouldn't really matter to my life, or the lives of anyone under the age of about 40, maybe more. It was so long ago, JFK was killed more recently! Man landed on the moon more recently. Hell, England won the World Cup more recently! The only reason it does matter is that the club won't let it lie. I can accept Bobby Charlton talking about, after all he lived through it, it actually happened to him, although it gets slightly galling when, unprovoked and unprompted, and entire unrelated to whatever he's talking about, he starts to reference it. In every interview he ever gives. I really can't stand Kenny Dalgliesh, he's a truly vile man, but he was at Hillsborough that day, he experienced the tragedy first hand, and far more recently. I can't remember, unless the actual topic of conversation was Hillsborough itself, him bring it up. In fact, he kept quiet about it for 20 years.

Basically, for many football fans, the constant referencing back to something that happened over 50 years ago and demanding attention, respect and compassion in relation to it wore thin a long time ago. The time gap between present day and the Munich air disaster is more than the time gap between the Munich air disaster and the Titanic sinking. Do you honestly think, in the 1950's, people thought about the Titanic at all, yet alone talked about it on a seemingly daily basis? And why would they? Disasters where people died or are killed occur each and every year. Do the respectful thing, keep it in-house. Remember and respect the dead, but don't make the mistake of thinking anyone else has to feel the same way, or wants to be involved. It's a United thing, from a long long time ago, it would be best to keep it that way.

Excellent post, Matty.
 
camelcoat said:
LoveCity said:
How long before they exhume the lot of them and charge people a tenner to see the remains. They must be running out of ideas on how to rape and pillage the disaster to make more money.

Bar the disgraceful AIG stunt can you point me towards other money making schemes?

The memorial match. Not so much a scheme to make money, more one to avoid paying anything.
The club had been underfire from all sides for not looking after the families of those who died or the players who survived (some never played again).
So the club organised the memorial match...... all proceeds from the gate money (ie fans and the TV rights) went to the families / survivors. Oh, after the likes of Cuntona took his £90 odd thousand fee out!!
I think the amount distributed was something like £42,000 each.
MUFC contributed zilch.

Cash from chaos.
 
Matty said:
camelcoat said:
SWP's back said:
It was, you are right.

You don't think you have a monopoly on it, you're simply the only club to merchandise and market it.

What a prick

I have no time whatsoever for Liverpool. I find most things about their club to be distasteful, moronic and entitled. However the way they handled Hillsborough, both at the time and over the proceeding years, has been pretty much impecable. I'm not talking about the events on that day and Liverpools role in them, I'm talking about the aftermath. Liverpool handled themselves with dignity, and respected those who died in a sympathetic manner. They are still fighting for the truth to come out, but apart from that, and the anniversary of the actual event, they keep themselves to themselves over the incident, a truly remarkable feat when you consider their propensity to grasp for anything to grieve over.

The you have the Munich air disaster, an equally tragic event, albeit 30 years prior to Hillsborough and with a lower death toll. Now if United simply acknowledged the anniversary with reverance each year people would have no issues whatsoever with it. After all, it's only right to remember those who died at that time. It's the seemingly weekly references to it in the media, both from United and non-united affiliated individuals which rankles and, ultimately, isn't doing United any favours on the sympathy/empathy front. It's like "that balmy night in 99" but with a tragic twist, a tragic twist that should see the event treated with respect and not used as a bi-line for articles, or a segway between unrelated points.

Add to that the increase in Worldwide appeal which has an undeniable link to the events of 50+ years ago and people start to feel apathy rather than empathy. United's profile, like it or not, was increased by the tragedy. That wasn't anyone's fault, it was inevitable. However there are ways of dealing with that, as time passes the association, in none United fans minds, between United and a specific disaster, diminishes, or at least should. Fans born 10 or 20 years after the air disaster have no reason to make the connection to any great degree, yes it happened, but so long ago it doesn't really factor into their view of the club. That natural distance between people now and the events of over half a century ago simply hasn't been allowed to happen. Rather than going for the more sympathetic approach, the more respectful approach of actually allowing the dead to rest in peace, in the way Liverpool have, United over the years have made constant reference to Munich. No-one has been left in any doubt as to just how tragic it all was. Without wishing to sound overly callous, the Munich air disaster shouldn't really matter to my life, or the lives of anyone under the age of about 40, maybe more. It was so long ago, JFK was killed more recently! Man landed on the moon more recently. Hell, England won the World Cup more recently! The only reason it does matter is that the club won't let it lie. I can accept Bobby Charlton talking about, after all he lived through it, it actually happened to him, although it gets slightly galling when, unprovoked and unprompted, and entire unrelated to whatever he's talking about, he starts to reference it. In every interview he ever gives. I really can't stand Kenny Dalgliesh, he's a truly vile man, but he was at Hillsborough that day, he experienced the tragedy first hand, and far more recently. I can't remember, unless the actual topic of conversation was Hillsborough itself, him bring it up. In fact, he kept quiet about it for 20 years.

Basically, for many football fans, the constant referencing back to something that happened over 50 years ago and demanding attention, respect and compassion in relation to it wore thin a long time ago. The time gap between present day and the Munich air disaster is more than the time gap between the Munich air disaster and the Titanic sinking. Do you honestly think, in the 1950's, people thought about the Titanic at all, yet alone talked about it on a seemingly daily basis? And why would they? Disasters where people died or are killed occur each and every year. Do the respectful thing, keep it in-house. Remember and respect the dead, but don't make the mistake of thinking anyone else has to feel the same way, or wants to be involved. It's a United thing, from a long long time ago, it would be best to keep it that way.

Excellent post.
 
1_barry_conlon said:
Millwallawayveteran1988 said:
SWP's back said:
This forum had a fair few

Glad you pointed that out....I was reading some of that and I have to say I found it odd that people were posting "Sat here in tears" etc etc. Now I was gutted for the lad and am glad it looks like it turned out ok but crying over someone that you have never met and dont know is a bit odd if you ask me.


It's the Princess Di wailers who kicked it all off. After that the precedence was set and we became a nation of professional mourners.
Like fuck it was,them Scouse bastards held that crown long before she curled her toes up,their the masters,always have been,even as i type they are threatening to ruin this years FA cup due to their inability to move on,they fuckin love it
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.